- From: Kai Eckert <kai@informatik.uni-mannheim.de>
- Date: Tue, 07 Feb 2012 14:16:49 +0100
- To: Eric Stephan <ericphb@gmail.com>
- CC: runnegar@isoc.org, public-prov-wg@w3.org
For me, Skype would work (if it works), but both is ok. I thought you had problems using Skype, at least at work, so feel free to choose whatever suits you :-) A telecon might be better, if more people choose to join us, in my experience, Skype CAN have problems with more than four participants. So, I consider the date as fixed. See you next Monday! Cheers, Kai Am 06.02.2012 20:22, schrieb Eric Stephan: > Yes this sounds great. Do you want to use my telecon number or try Skype? > > Eric > > On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 10:05 AM,<runnegar@isoc.org> wrote: >> Hello Kai and Eric. >> >> >> >> Monday next week would work for me if you would like to "meet". >> >> >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: "Kai Eckert"<kai@informatik.uni-mannheim.de> >> Sent: Monday, 6 February, 2012 6:42pm >> To: "Eric Stephan"<ericphb@gmail.com> >> Cc: public-prov-wg@w3.org >> Subject: Re: Update Connection TF >> >> Ok, maybe it was a little bit exaggerated to say we are on hold, that >> does not mean that we are not allowed to do anything ;-) It was more a >> confirmation that currently no concrete steps, especially regarding the >> organization of specific conference calls, are expected by the WG. >> >> The rationale behind that is that such a call should be properly >> announced to the connection group, involve the bridge person >> substantially and not least is an expenditure of time for the WG members >> and the participants of the connection group. Probably we can not do >> that more than once for each connection, so we should not waste that >> opportunity and be sure that we have the proper ground for fruitful >> discussions and significant results. >> >> But of course we can continue on our side in the preparation work and >> with our report, and any input of our connections is highly appreciated >> (and needed) for the WG work. >> >> As you pointed out, the extraction of patterns based on our personal >> work with connections where we are directly related to would be very useful. >> >> How about a TF call next Monday at 5 PM CET/11 AM EST, as usual? >> >> Cheers, >> >> Kai >> >> >> Am 06.02.2012 18:23, schrieb Eric Stephan: >>> Sounds reasonable about your approach with the Dublin Core vocabulary, >>> It would be useful if possible that your experiences and >>> methodologies are recorded in some fashion to help describe a pattern >>> for others to follow who also wish to map their vocabularies to PROV. >>> >>> I don't entirely agree with the concept of the Connection Task Force >>> being on hold until the draft documents are stable enough, because >>> this perspective represents only one side of each "connection". The >>> other side of each connection is articulating provenance requirements >>> and practices. I 'm not advocating we meet frequently, but I would be >>> in support of maintaining our informal report. For instance my >>> connection work continues on my various research endeavors, but it >>> would be nice to have a means to share this with our working group. >>> >>> Thoughts? >>> >>> Eric >>> >>> >>> >>> On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 7:32 AM, Kai Eckert >>> <kai@informatik.uni-mannheim.de> wrote: >>>> Hi Eric and all, >>>> >>>> I would like to give a short update regarding the Connection TF after >>>> our F2F meeting last week. As proposed in the telco of Oct 20th, 2011 >>>> [1], we would organize special telcos with member of connection groups, >>>> like Creative Commons, to discuss our PROV model and work towards >>>> best-practice recommendations for these groups. >>>> >>>> However, as our model is still subject to change, we will not approach >>>> these external groups before we consider the model and the draft >>>> documents stable enough to allow a proper discussion and collaboration >>>> with >>>> these groups. >>>> >>>> Instead, we will first start with best-practice recommendations and >>>> outreach >>>> towards groups where we are directly connected via WG members, namely >>>> first >>>> and foremost Dublin Core (via me). I took the responsibility to launch a >>>> preliminary mapping between Dublin Core and PROV. >>>> >>>> The connection TF is on hold, until the WG declares the PROV model and >>>> the >>>> documents as ready, then we will continue with the outreach activities. >>>> >>>> Cheers, >>>> >>>> Kai >>>> >>>> >>>> [1] http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/meeting/2011-10-20 >>>> -- >>>> Kai Eckert >>>> Universitätsbibliothek Mannheim >>>> Stellv. Leiter Abteilung Digitale Bibliotheksdienste >>>> Schloss Schneckhof West / 68131 Mannheim >>>> Tel. 0621/181-2946 Fax 0621/181-2918 >>> >> >> -- >> Kai Eckert >> Universitätsbibliothek Mannheim >> Stellv. Leiter Abteilung Digitale Bibliotheksdienste >> Schloss Schneckhof West / 68131 Mannheim >> Tel. 0621/181-2946 Fax 0621/181-2918 >> >> >> >> > -- Kai Eckert Universitätsbibliothek Mannheim Stellv. Leiter Abteilung Digitale Bibliotheksdienste Schloss Schneckhof West / 68131 Mannheim Tel. 0621/181-2946 Fax 0621/181-2918
Received on Tuesday, 7 February 2012 13:19:54 UTC