- From: Stian Soiland-Reyes <soiland-reyes@cs.manchester.ac.uk>
- Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2012 09:10:21 +0000
- To: Luc Moreau <l.moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
- Cc: public-prov-wg@w3.org
There is a bug if you use Protege 4.0 - 4.1 should work. I'm investigating now what is wrong in 4.0. On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 09:08, Luc Moreau <l.moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk> wrote: > All, I can no longer load the ontology in Protege. Can you check it's all > OK? > > Luc > > > On 22/02/2012 09:01, Stian Soiland-Reyes wrote: >> >> On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 11:46, Khalid Belhajjame >> <Khalid.Belhajjame@cs.man.ac.uk> wrote: >> >> >> >>> >>> We decided to model only wasStartedBy that involves an agent. So that I >>> think, we can safely define Start as a sub-class of Association. >>> >> >> So something like in >> http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/wiki/ProvRDF#Starting_again ? >> >> I'm not sure if I like this - here the involvement is both a >> prov:Start and prov:Inform at the same time - and a phantom agent ?ag1 >> is introduced. >> >> .. or we simply say that Starting_again is not mapped to RDF? >> >> > > -- Stian Soiland-Reyes, myGrid team School of Computer Science The University of Manchester
Received on Wednesday, 22 February 2012 09:11:13 UTC