Re: VOTE: PROV-DM Identifiers (deadline Wednesday 29/02, midnight GMT)

+1

Best,
Satya

On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 5:25 PM, Daniel Garijo <
dgarijo@delicias.dia.fi.upm.es> wrote:

> I had already answered in the revision thread, but
> +1 to close the issues.
>
> Best,
> Daniel
>
>
> 2012/2/28 Luc Moreau <L.Moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
>
>>
>> Dear all,
>>
>> Kind reminder for a vote.
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Professor Luc Moreau
>> Electronics and Computer Science
>> University of Southampton
>> Southampton SO17 1BJ
>> United Kingdom
>>
>> On 24 Feb 2012, at 00:21, "Luc Moreau" <L.Moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk> wrote:
>>
>> >
>> > Dear all,
>> >
>> > Today, we have agreed [1] to reorganize the PROV-DM deliverable in
>> three separate documents:
>> >
>> > PROV-DM: http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/prov/raw-file/default/model/prov-dm.html
>> > PROV-DM-CONSTRAINTS:
>> http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/prov/raw-file/default/model/prov-dm-constraints.html
>> > PROV-ASN:
>> http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/prov/raw-file/default/model/prov-asn.html
>> >
>> > As part of the reorganization, we dropped the notion of 'record', the
>> notion of 'account record', the
>> > idea of 'nested account records', and associated idea of scope, in the
>> spirit of simplification discussed
>> > at F2F2.
>> >
>> > Given this, we propose to close all issues related to identifiers,
>> namely:
>> >
>> > - ISSUE-145,
>> > - ISSUE-183,
>> > - ISSUE-215,
>> > - ISSUE-225 and
>> > - ISSUE-234
>> >
>> > Can you express your support in the usual way, or continue the
>> discussion for the respective issues.
>> > (Please cast a vote for each issue).
>> >
>> > Deadline: deadline Wednesday 29/02, midnight GMT
>> >
>> > Regards,
>> > Luc
>> >
>> > [1] http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/meeting/2012-02-23#resolution_2
>>
>>
>