- From: Luc Moreau <L.Moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
- Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2012 12:35:02 +0000
- To: public-prov-wg@w3.org
Hi Jun That's an interesting observation. The first 3 belong to the core specializationOf alternateOf wasDerivedFrom All the others belong to "common relations". The following should be subrelations of wasDerivedFrom wasSummaryOf ->To be dropped probably wasQuotedFrom hadOriginalSource wasRevisionOf Range is agent for this one: wasAttributedTo This one is the only transitive relation: tracedTo I am not sure how we can simplify this, given that common relations include common short cuts. Luc On 02/16/2012 02:39 PM, Jun Zhao wrote: > > And there are 9 (!) object properties to associate an entity with > another entity or a subclass of it. That's a lot of different types of > object properties between two classes! Is there any way to simplify > it, either in the DM doc or in the ontology? -- Professor Luc Moreau Electronics and Computer Science tel: +44 23 8059 4487 University of Southampton fax: +44 23 8059 2865 Southampton SO17 1BJ email: l.moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk United Kingdom http://www.ecs.soton.ac.uk/~lavm
Received on Friday, 17 February 2012 12:35:34 UTC