Re: Tim's approach on Involvement

All, I can no longer load the ontology in Protege. Can you check it's 
all OK?

Luc

On 22/02/2012 09:01, Stian Soiland-Reyes wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 11:46, Khalid Belhajjame
> <Khalid.Belhajjame@cs.man.ac.uk>  wrote:
>
>
>    
>> We decided to model only wasStartedBy that involves an agent. So that I
>> think, we can safely define Start as a sub-class of Association.
>>      
> So something like in http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/wiki/ProvRDF#Starting_again ?
>
> I'm not sure if I like this - here the involvement is both a
> prov:Start and prov:Inform at the same time - and a phantom agent ?ag1
> is introduced.
>
> .. or we simply say that Starting_again is not mapped to RDF?
>
>    

Received on Wednesday, 22 February 2012 09:09:15 UTC