- From: Luc Moreau <L.Moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
- Date: Mon, 06 Feb 2012 21:32:35 +0000
- To: public-prov-wg@w3.org
Hi Tim, I am keen to replace 'relation' (and 'element') by more appropriate names. I am not sure why 'involvement'? involvement in what? How appropriate is it for alternateOf? Thanks, Luc On 06/02/12 21:01, Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker wrote: > PROV-ISSUE-237 (TLebo): Rename Relation to Involvement [prov-dm] > > http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/track/issues/237 > > Raised by: Timothy Lebo > On product: prov-dm > > I propose to rename "Relation" in PROV-DM to "Involvement" because "Relation" is too broad and a provenance interchange should limit itself to how agents, activities, and entities were involved with one another as the lead to some result. > > Relations other than involvements should be out of scope for provenance interchange (and seem to be already be handled with the attribute-values). > > Thanks, > Tim > > > >
Received on Monday, 6 February 2012 21:36:29 UTC