- From: Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker <sysbot+tracker@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 06 Feb 2012 21:52:05 +0000
- To: public-prov-wg@w3.org
PROV-ISSUE-243 (TLebo): how to interpret ASN assertions with incomplete arity? http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/track/issues/243 Raised by: Timothy Lebo On product: wasGeneratedBy is defined as arity 5. The DM asserts in a rule (I've changed the variables): wasGeneratedBy(a,b,c) is c a(n) 1) Activity 2) Time 3) attribute-values? The answer is intended to be 3), but it is clearly ambiguous without context. I propose to include parameter omissions explicitly in ASN statements: wasGeneratedBy(a,b,[],[],c) Thanks, Tim
Received on Monday, 6 February 2012 21:54:18 UTC