- From: Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker <sysbot+tracker@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 06 Feb 2012 20:53:15 +0000
- To: public-prov-wg@w3.org
PROV-ISSUE-236 (TLebo): rendered provenance is a thing in the world [prov-dm] http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/track/issues/236 Raised by: Timothy Lebo On product: prov-dm I have concerns about the phrasing of the following: "In this example, the attribute-value pairs do not constitute a representation of something in the world; they are just used to help render provenance." I would argue that the rendered provenance glyph on the screen _is_ a thing in the world and that the properties "[ex:color="blue", ex:screenX=20, ex:screenY=30]" are describing _that_ instead of the entity. I suggest rephrasing it to something like: "In this example, the attribute-value pairs are not part of the entity's characterization within this assertion. Instead, the attribute-value pairs are describing how the characterization has or could be rendered in a user interface." Thanks, Tim
Received on Monday, 6 February 2012 20:55:20 UTC