Re: VOTE: PROV-DM Identifiers (deadline Wednesday 29/02, midnight GMT)

+1

-- jun

On 29 Feb 2012, at 00:36, Satya Sahoo <satya.sahoo@case.edu> wrote:

> +1
> 
> Best,
> Satya
> 
> On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 5:25 PM, Daniel Garijo <dgarijo@delicias.dia.fi.upm.es> wrote:
> I had already answered in the revision thread, but
> +1 to close the issues.
> 
> Best,
> Daniel
> 
> 
> 2012/2/28 Luc Moreau <L.Moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
> 
> Dear all,
> 
> Kind reminder for a vote.
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Professor Luc Moreau
> Electronics and Computer Science
> University of Southampton
> Southampton SO17 1BJ
> United Kingdom
> 
> On 24 Feb 2012, at 00:21, "Luc Moreau" <L.Moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk> wrote:
> 
> >
> > Dear all,
> >
> > Today, we have agreed [1] to reorganize the PROV-DM deliverable in three separate documents:
> >
> > PROV-DM: http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/prov/raw-file/default/model/prov-dm.html
> > PROV-DM-CONSTRAINTS: http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/prov/raw-file/default/model/prov-dm-constraints.html
> > PROV-ASN: http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/prov/raw-file/default/model/prov-asn.html
> >
> > As part of the reorganization, we dropped the notion of 'record', the notion of 'account record', the
> > idea of 'nested account records', and associated idea of scope, in the spirit of simplification discussed
> > at F2F2.
> >
> > Given this, we propose to close all issues related to identifiers, namely:
> >
> > - ISSUE-145,
> > - ISSUE-183,
> > - ISSUE-215,
> > - ISSUE-225 and
> > - ISSUE-234
> >
> > Can you express your support in the usual way, or continue the discussion for the respective issues.
> > (Please cast a vote for each issue).
> >
> > Deadline: deadline Wednesday 29/02, midnight GMT
> >
> > Regards,
> > Luc
> >
> > [1] http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/meeting/2012-02-23#resolution_2
> 
> 
>