- From: Simon Miles <simon.miles@kcl.ac.uk>
- Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2012 11:18:55 +0000
- To: Provenance Working Group WG <public-prov-wg@w3.org>
Hello PROV-O team, Here's my quick review of the PROV-O ontology, as requested last telecon. In general, it seems fine. It seems odd that hadLocation has a domain of owl:Thing. So what is it's connection to provenance? What does it mean that hasAnnotation does not have a specified domain (my ignorance of RDFS)? If it means that it applies to anything, then what is the distinction between using hasAnnotation and just giving an arbitrary non-prov RDF statement? What is its connection to provenance? The old W3C 2006 Time namespace is still used/included. Is use of this ontology to be removed in the next revision? I notice that comments (at least for adoptedPlan) still refer to ProcessExecution. Thanks, Simon -- Dr Simon Miles Lecturer, Department of Informatics Kings College London, WC2R 2LS, UK +44 (0)20 7848 1166 Efficient Multi-Granularity Service Composition: http://eprints.dcs.kcl.ac.uk/1396/
Received on Thursday, 16 February 2012 11:19:26 UTC