- From: Khalid Belhajjame <Khalid.Belhajjame@cs.man.ac.uk>
- Date: Wed, 29 Feb 2012 10:32:44 +0000
- To: Luc Moreau <L.Moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
- CC: Provenance Working Group <public-prov-wg@w3.org>
+1 Makes sense to me. khalid On 28/02/2012 20:46, Luc Moreau wrote: > Dear all, > > Kind reminder for a vote. > > Thanks, > > Professor Luc Moreau > Electronics and Computer Science > University of Southampton > Southampton SO17 1BJ > United Kingdom > > On 24 Feb 2012, at 00:21, "Luc Moreau"<L.Moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk> wrote: > >> Dear all, >> >> Today, we have agreed [1] to reorganize the PROV-DM deliverable in three separate documents: >> >> PROV-DM: http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/prov/raw-file/default/model/prov-dm.html >> PROV-DM-CONSTRAINTS: http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/prov/raw-file/default/model/prov-dm-constraints.html >> PROV-ASN: http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/prov/raw-file/default/model/prov-asn.html >> >> As part of the reorganization, we dropped the notion of 'record', the notion of 'account record', the >> idea of 'nested account records', and associated idea of scope, in the spirit of simplification discussed >> at F2F2. >> >> Given this, we propose to close all issues related to identifiers, namely: >> >> - ISSUE-145, >> - ISSUE-183, >> - ISSUE-215, >> - ISSUE-225 and >> - ISSUE-234 >> >> Can you express your support in the usual way, or continue the discussion for the respective issues. >> (Please cast a vote for each issue). >> >> Deadline: deadline Wednesday 29/02, midnight GMT >> >> Regards, >> Luc >> >> [1] http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/meeting/2012-02-23#resolution_2 >
Received on Wednesday, 29 February 2012 10:33:12 UTC