- From: Khalid Belhajjame <Khalid.Belhajjame@cs.man.ac.uk>
- Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2012 10:07:05 +0000
- To: Timothy Lebo <lebot@rpi.edu>
- CC: "public-prov-wg@w3.org Group" <public-prov-wg@w3.org>
Tim, Thanks for this. I notice that we are using Activity (resp. Entity) as a name of a class and activity (resp. entity) as a name for object property. In order to be consistent with the terms we are using for property names, I would suggest to use hadActivity (or involvedActivity) and hasEntity (or involvedEntity) as property names instead. Thanks, khalid On 21/02/2012 06:19, Timothy Lebo wrote: > PROV-O team, > > I have updated the owl file. Below is a description of what I generated. > > <http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/prov/file/0523d130a6d7/ontology/ProvenanceOntology.owl> > prov:specializationOf<http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/prov/file/tip/ontology/ProvenanceOntology.owl>; > prov:alternateOf<http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/prov/raw-file/0523d130a6d7/ontology/ProvenanceOntology.owl>; > prov:wasRevisionOf<http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/prov/file/4ee3021a9412/ontology/ProvenanceOntology.owl>; > prov:qualified [ > a prov:Revision; > prov:entity<http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/prov/file/4ee3021a9412/ontology/ProvenanceOntology.owl>; > :diff<http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/prov/rev/0523d130a6d7>; > ] > . > > <http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/prov/raw-file/0523d130a6d7/ontology/ProvenanceOntology.owl> > prov:specializationOf<http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/prov/raw-file/tip/ontology/ProvenanceOntology.owl> > . > > It sounded like the PROV-O team was to review before releasing to the owl file reviewers, which are to review by Thursday. > > > Regards, > Tim > > > > On Feb 20, 2012, at 11:58 PM, Timothy Lebo wrote: > >> Stian, >> >> Thanks. I reflected your notes into my revision of the ontology. >> I'm adopting your naming of the new properties (activity, entity, qualified) >> Based on your lead, I deleted the subprops of qualified, which trims the ontology up nicely, but I'm wondering how one figures out the pattern. >> >> new .owl out soon... >> >> -Tim >> >> On Feb 20, 2012, at 1:39 PM, Stian Soiland-Reyes wrote: >> >>> During the last bit of the call I did the modifications in the OWL >>> file in Protege to do what I understood was Tim's approach: >>> >>> http://titanpad.com/LbHy9n4Fb4 >>> >>> >>> New classes: Timed, Involvement, AgentInvolvement, >>> ActivityInvolvement, EntityInvolvement >>> >>> New properties: activity, entity, qualified >>> >>> Renamed hadTemporalValue -> time >>> >>> Deleted: hadQualifiedInvolvent and 'sub'-props. (but not hadQuoted/quoter yet) >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Stian Soiland-Reyes, myGrid team >>> School of Computer Science >>> The University of Manchester >>> >> >> > >
Received on Tuesday, 21 February 2012 10:07:34 UTC