- From: Paolo Missier <Paolo.Missier@ncl.ac.uk>
- Date: Mon, 06 Feb 2012 22:57:52 +0000
- To: public-prov-wg@w3.org
The activity should not be optional, surely? -Paolo On 2/6/12 9:19 PM, Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker wrote: > PROV-ISSUE-239 (TLebo): is wasGeneratedBy(e) meaningful? [prov-dm] > > http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/track/issues/239 > > Raised by: Timothy Lebo > On product: prov-dm > > Everything but entity is OPTIONAL in wasGeneratedBy. > > If I say only wasGeneratedBy(e), what did I say? And why was I allowed to say it? > > from WD3: > > > A generation record, written wasGeneratedBy(id,e,a,t,attrs) in PROV-ASN, has the following components: > > id: an optional identifier id identifying the generation record; > entity: an identifier e identifying an entity record that represents the entity that is created; > activity: an optional identifier a identifying an activity record that represents the activity that creates the entity; > > > -- ----------- ~oo~ -------------- Paolo Missier - Paolo.Missier@newcastle.ac.uk, pmissier@acm.org School of Computing Science, Newcastle University, UK http://www.cs.ncl.ac.uk/people/Paolo.Missier
Received on Monday, 6 February 2012 23:02:06 UTC