- From: Khalid Belhajjame <Khalid.Belhajjame@cs.man.ac.uk>
- Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2012 11:46:20 +0000
- To: Stian Soiland-Reyes <soiland-reyes@cs.manchester.ac.uk>
- CC: Timothy Lebo <lebot@rpi.edu>, "public-prov-wg@w3.org Group" <public-prov-wg@w3.org>
On 21/02/2012 11:26, Stian Soiland-Reyes wrote: > On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 10:31, Stian Soiland-Reyes > <soiland-reyes@cs.manchester.ac.uk> wrote: >> On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 04:58, Timothy Lebo<lebot@rpi.edu> wrote: >> >>> I'm adopting your naming of the new properties (activity, entity, qualified) >>> Based on your lead, I deleted the subprops of qualified, which trims the ontology up nicely, but I'm wondering how one figures out the pattern. >> This looks pretty good. Thanks for also updating ProvRDF. I'll go >> through it with my changes from below. > Fixed various things that were missing on ProvRDF.. several > involvements did not include their prov:entity! ;-) > > http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/wiki/ProvRDF now matches the OWL file. > > > I updated the OWL file again as my mind processed the ProvRDF page: > http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/prov/raw-file/tip/ontology/ProvenanceOntology.owl > > > > actedOnBehalfOf and tracedTo subproperty of involved > hadOriginalSource subprop of wasDerivedFrom (according to DM) > hadQuotedAgent and hadQuoterAgent no longer subprop of entity (they > confuse with the 'real' entity in the Quotation) > > End subclass of Association - but Start subclass of Involvement (as it > plays double role on http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/wiki/ProvRDF#Starting > and http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/wiki/ProvRDF#Starting_again ) We decided to model only wasStartedBy that involves an agent. So that I think, we can safely define Start as a sub-class of Association. khalid > > > >
Received on Tuesday, 21 February 2012 11:46:46 UTC