- From: Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker <sysbot+tracker@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2012 18:17:12 +0000
- To: public-prov-wg@w3.org
PROV-ISSUE-260 (TLebo): In Note section: cite prov:Provenance as better practice to annotate assertions. [prov-dm]
http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/track/issues/260
Raised by: Timothy Lebo
On product: prov-dm
Please add a note to section Note to encourage people to use Account / AccountEntity/ Provenance to annotate provenance assertions as a better practice. When using AccountEntity, the annotated thing can be described _directly_ as a single triple instead of using Notes. Notes are very much "scruffy provenance" and do not benefit from the directness afforded by AccountEntity / prov:Provenance.
:prov_1 {
:simon a prov:Human;
prov:hasAnnotation [
a prov:Note; ex3:reputation "excellent";
rdfs:comment "This is a kludge way to get indirection. Use prov:Provenance instead.";
];
}
:prov_2 {
:simon ex3:reputation "excellent" .
}
:prov_1 a prov:Provenance; prov:wasAttributedTo :first_asserter .
:prov_2 a prov:Provenance; prov:wasAttributedTo :trust_evaluator_agent.
Thanks,
Tim
Received on Wednesday, 22 February 2012 18:17:17 UTC