- From: Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker <sysbot+tracker@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2012 18:17:12 +0000
- To: public-prov-wg@w3.org
PROV-ISSUE-260 (TLebo): In Note section: cite prov:Provenance as better practice to annotate assertions. [prov-dm] http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/track/issues/260 Raised by: Timothy Lebo On product: prov-dm Please add a note to section Note to encourage people to use Account / AccountEntity/ Provenance to annotate provenance assertions as a better practice. When using AccountEntity, the annotated thing can be described _directly_ as a single triple instead of using Notes. Notes are very much "scruffy provenance" and do not benefit from the directness afforded by AccountEntity / prov:Provenance. :prov_1 { :simon a prov:Human; prov:hasAnnotation [ a prov:Note; ex3:reputation "excellent"; rdfs:comment "This is a kludge way to get indirection. Use prov:Provenance instead."; ]; } :prov_2 { :simon ex3:reputation "excellent" . } :prov_1 a prov:Provenance; prov:wasAttributedTo :first_asserter . :prov_2 a prov:Provenance; prov:wasAttributedTo :trust_evaluator_agent. Thanks, Tim
Received on Wednesday, 22 February 2012 18:17:17 UTC