- From: Khalid Belhajjame <Khalid.Belhajjame@cs.man.ac.uk>
- Date: Tue, 07 Feb 2012 16:52:56 +0000
- To: Provenance Working Group <public-prov-wg@w3.org>
- CC: Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker <sysbot+tracker@w3.org>
On 06/02/2012 20:53, Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker wrote: > PROV-ISSUE-236 (TLebo): rendered provenance is a thing in the world [prov-dm] > > http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/track/issues/236 > > Raised by: Timothy Lebo > On product: prov-dm > > I have concerns about the phrasing of the following: > > "In this example, the attribute-value pairs do not constitute a representation of something in the world; they are just used to help render provenance." > > I would argue that the rendered provenance glyph on the screen _is_ a thing in the world and that the properties "[ex:color="blue", ex:screenX=20, ex:screenY=30]" are describing _that_ instead of the entity. > > I suggest rephrasing it to something like: > > "In this example, the attribute-value pairs are not part of the entity's characterization within this assertion. Instead, the attribute-value pairs are describing how the characterization has or could be rendered in a user interface." +1 Yes, this seems to be less confusing. khalid > Thanks, > Tim > > > >
Received on Tuesday, 7 February 2012 16:57:19 UTC