- From: Stephan Zednik <zednis@rpi.edu>
- Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2012 10:17:17 -0700
- To: Timothy Lebo <lebot@rpi.edu>
- Cc: Provenance Working Group <public-prov-wg@w3.org>
I will be happy to close this issue when the group decides on a name change for temporal extents that are restricted to intervals and drops usage of hadTemporalExtent. occurredDuring? I am not sure what the domain of this property should be. I am not entirely warm to Durable. --Stephan On Feb 23, 2012, at 10:53 PM, Timothy Lebo wrote: > Stephan, > > Previous changes on hadTemporalExtent (becoming occurredAt) + changes: > > http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/prov/diff/601fe1fa5bfd/ontology/ProvenanceOntology.owl > and > http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/prov/diff/f39e3afc55b5/ontology/ProvenanceOntology.owl > and > http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/prov/diff/201e6e6d9cbf/ontology/ProvenanceOntology.owl > > should be close to your request. > > I'm open to name suggestions for the domain of hadTemporalExtent (currently, Durable). > Activities are a subclass of Durable. > > I'm changing this issue to pending review. > > -Tim > > > > On Feb 22, 2012, at 1:06 PM, Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker wrote: > >> PROV-ISSUE-259: hadTemporalExtent domain and range [Ontology] >> >> http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/track/issues/259 >> >> Raised by: Stephan Zednik >> On product: Ontology >> >> hadTemporalExtent has rdfs:domain prov:Involvement, which means if anything has a prov:hadTemporalExtent that it will be inferred to be a member of the class prov:Involvement. >> >> Since a temporal extent describes the time (interval or instant) over which something occurred, I would prefer to not restrict the class of things with temporal extent to Involvement. For example, I think it would make sense in practice for Activities to use hadTemporalExtent. >> >> Also, I would like the range of hadTemporalExtent to be relaxed to include both TimeInstant and intervals of time (which we currently do not model in prov-o). In OWL-Time this would be time:TemporalEntity (union of time:Instant and time:Interval). >> >> --Stephan >> >> >> >> >> > > >
Received on Monday, 27 February 2012 17:18:31 UTC