- From: Satya Sahoo <satya.sahoo@case.edu>
- Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2012 14:57:19 -0500
- To: Jim McCusker <mccusj@rpi.edu>
- Cc: Provenance Working Group <public-prov-wg@w3.org>
Received on Tuesday, 28 February 2012 19:57:56 UTC
On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 2:28 PM, Jim McCusker <mccusj@rpi.edu> wrote: > I propose Provenance Notation (PROV-N). Since it's parseable and > inter-convertable, it's not abstract. +1 > It's a domain-specific language for provenance. > > if needed, a possible alternative PROV-DSL? Best, Satya > Jim > > > On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 6:43 PM, Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker < > sysbot+tracker@w3.org> wrote: > >> PROV-ISSUE-273 (name-for-asn): what name for the provenance notation >> [prov-dm] >> >> http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/track/issues/273 >> >> Raised by: Luc Moreau >> On product: prov-dm >> >> >> What name for the provenance notation? And which short prefix? >> >> PROV-ASN stands for Abstract Syntax Notation ... but it's not an abstract >> syntax. >> >> Suggestions? >> >> Luc >> >> >> >> >> >> > > > -- > Jim McCusker > Programmer Analyst > Krauthammer Lab, Pathology Informatics > Yale School of Medicine > james.mccusker@yale.edu | (203) 785-6330 > http://krauthammerlab.med.yale.edu > > PhD Student > Tetherless World Constellation > Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute > mccusj@cs.rpi.edu > http://tw.rpi.edu >
Received on Tuesday, 28 February 2012 19:57:56 UTC