- From: Timothy Lebo <lebot@rpi.edu>
- Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2012 11:41:56 -0500
- To: Daniel Garijo <dgarijo@delicias.dia.fi.upm.es>
- Cc: "public-prov-wg@w3.org Group" <public-prov-wg@w3.org>
- Message-Id: <D6C1BC49-9436-4F57-B817-69E8784C8D1F@rpi.edu>
Thanks, Daniel! I'll dig in later this afternoon. Could the rest of the prov-o team sign http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/wiki/ProvRDF#Mapping_coverage after they've reviewed the list? Also, please feel free to take a stab at right hands, or make notes under each rule. Thanks, Tim On Feb 10, 2012, at 11:29 AM, Daniel Garijo wrote: > Done. > > Daniel > > 2012/2/10 Timothy Lebo <lebot@rpi.edu> > Thank you, Daniel. > > I look forward to reviewing what you've done. > > I know you've also created the lists > > http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/wiki/ProvRDF#List_of_terms_that_are_going_to_be_modeled_in_order_to_align_PROV-O_to_WD3 > http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/wiki/ProvRDF#List_of_terms_that_are_NOT_going_to_be_modeled_in_PROV-O_to_WD3__alignement > > Can you move each classification here down next to the rule? > > So, instead of saying "We won't do wasEndedBy and Account", this rule page will have that mentioned in each section: > > == Account === > > DM => PROVO > > We will not do this mapping yet. > > == wasEndedBy === > > DM => PROVO > > We will not do this mapping yet. > > > > I think it's best if we stay DM-centric so that we can stay oriented. > > Also, I'd like to get rid of the lists at the top when their information has made it to the appropriate sections. > > Thanks, > Tim > > > On Feb 10, 2012, at 10:50 AM, Daniel Garijo wrote: > >> Hi Tim, >> I've completed the left list (in order), and I've also completed the actedOnBehalfOf according >> to what was discussed on the mailing list. >> >> Thanks, >> >> Daniel >> >> 2012/2/10 Timothy Lebo <lebot@rpi.edu> >> prov-o team, >> >> We agreed to have a complete list of "left hand sides" listed at [1] by today. >> >> It is still incomplete. >> >> This is mostly a copy-paste activity. The heavy lifting comes in filling in the right hand sides. >> >> The purpose of our goal today was to extract _all_ of the DM ASN signatures so that we had a concise view of the work ahead of us. >> I've argued before (and heard some agreement) that we maintain the order of the rules to suit the original order in the DM. >> >> I have about 10 done, and I think someone did the Derivation. >> >> Can we get more eyes on copy/pasting the signatures from DM into left hand sides of these rules? >> >> If the pattern is not obvious from the 11 rules that are already there, please ask for clarification. >> >> >> I will work on the list this afternoon, but won't be able to get back to it until Sunday afternoon. >> >> Thanks for your consideration. >> >> Regards, >> Tim >> >> >> >> >> [1] http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/wiki/ProvRDF >> > >
Received on Friday, 10 February 2012 16:55:16 UTC