I thought it was more like an example rather than "forcing" to use owl:Time
ontology.
In fact in the document we say: "this class *can* be re-used from the OWL
Time ontology"...
Daniel
2012/2/2 Stian Soiland-Reyes <soiland-reyes@cs.manchester.ac.uk>
> On Thu, Feb 2, 2012 at 08:44, Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker
> <sysbot+tracker@w3.org> wrote:
> > PROV-ISSUE-231 (TLebo): Remove owl:Time from prov-o [Ontology]
> >
> > http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/track/issues/231
>
> As a first transition, we can change the current time:Instant etc. to
> just prov:Instant. They are already verbatim in the OWL, copied from
> time.owl (to avoid owl:import)
>
>
> (I feel it's sad that the OWL Time ontology was never completed to a
> standard, as it's quite well made!)
>
>
> --
> Stian Soiland-Reyes, myGrid team
> School of Computer Science
> The University of Manchester
>
>