[dxwg] Dataset series (#868)
[dxwg] Pull Request: Remove explicit Provenance sections
[dxwg] Pull Request: Remove explicit Provenance sections
[dxwg] Pull Request: Remove annex/chapter describing external alignments
[dxwg] Pull Request: Remove annex/chapter describing external alignments
Re: [dxwg] DCAT - LDP (Linked Data Platform) alignment (#254)
[dxwg] Pull Request: Update DCAT-schema.org mapping
[dxwg] Pull Request: Update DCAT-schema.org mapping
[dxwg] new commits pushed by nicholascar
Minutes of the CNEG subgroup meeting from 2019-03-27
[dxwg] Pull Request: fixed broken links fro 2PWD
[dxwg] Pull Request: fixed broken links fro 2PWD
[dxwg] new commits pushed by nicholascar
Poll for the publication of the PROF 2nd PWD
[dxwg] Pull Request: Editorial change
[dxwg] Pull Request: Editorial change
[dxwg] new commits pushed by davebrowning
[dxwg] Pull Request: Fixing dcat ttl riccardo
Karen on sabbatical April and May
[dxwg] Pull Request: Fixing dcat ttl riccardo
[dxwg] Pull Request: Updates to profile guidance sections 2.2 & 2.3
[dxwg] Pull Request: Updates to profile guidance sections 2.2 & 2.3
- Re: [dxwg] Updates to profile guidance sections 2.2 & 2.3 (#861)
- Re: [dxwg] Updates to profile guidance sections 2.2 & 2.3 (#861)
- Re: [dxwg] Updates to profile guidance sections 2.2 & 2.3 (#861)
FW: Reminder: Publishing moratorium for first half of 2019
[dxwg] new commits pushed by davebrowning
[dxwg] Pull Request: Dcat issue174 ttl riccardo
- Re: [dxwg] Dcat issue174 ttl riccardo (#860)
- Re: [dxwg] Dcat issue174 ttl riccardo (#860)
- Re: [dxwg] Dcat issue174 ttl riccardo (#860)
- Re: [dxwg] Dcat issue174 ttl riccardo (#860)
- Re: [dxwg] Dcat issue174 ttl riccardo (#860)
[dxwg] new commits pushed by davebrowning
[dxwg] Pull Request: fixes for Issue 858
[dxwg] Pull Request: fixes for Issue 858
[dxwg] Editorial issues in prof:inheritedFrom example (#858)
- Re: [dxwg] Editorial issues in prof:inheritedFrom example (#858)
- Re: [dxwg] Editorial issues in prof:inheritedFrom example (#858)
- Re: [dxwg] Editorial issues in prof:inheritedFrom example (#858)
- Re: [dxwg] Editorial issues in prof:inheritedFrom example (#858)
- Re: [dxwg] Editorial issues in prof:inheritedFrom example (#858)
- Re: [dxwg] Editorial issues in prof:inheritedFrom example (#858)
- Closed: [dxwg] Editorial issues in prof:inheritedFrom example (#858)
[dxwg] What is the level of the inheritance link? (#857)
[dxwg] Moving some PROF material to an "advanced" section? (#856)
- Re: [dxwg] Moving some PROF material to an "advanced" section? (#856)
- Re: [dxwg] Moving some PROF material to an "advanced" section? (#856)
[dxwg] new commits pushed by davebrowning
New meeting time proposals for Conneg subgroup
[dxwg] new commits pushed by nicholascar
[dxwg] Remove Annex A.2 (alignment with PROV-O) (#855)
[dxwg] Pull Request: Adding Spanish translations and aligning text to spec
[dxwg] Pull Request: Adding Spanish translations and aligning text to spec
- Re: [dxwg] Adding Spanish translations and aligning text to spec (#854)
- Re: [dxwg] Adding Spanish translations and aligning text to spec (#854)
[dxwg] Remove Annex B (external alignments) (#853)
dxwg-ACTION-320: Propose new meeting times
Re: Profile Guidance - New PR
[dxwg] new commits pushed by agbeltran
[dxwg] new commits pushed by agbeltran
[dxwg] create sequence diagram for conneg-by-ap process (#852)
Forward programme
[dxwg] Pull Request: Drop ambiguous text
[dxwg] Pull Request: Drop ambiguous text
[dxwg] new commits pushed by davebrowning
[dxwg] Pull Request: Prof 2 pwd
[dxwg] Pull Request: Prof 2 pwd
Closed: [dxwg] Initial example (#695)
Re: [dxwg] Initial example (#695)
[dxwg] new commits pushed by davebrowning
[dxwg] Outstanding work for Alignment annex (#849)
- Re: [dxwg] Outstanding work for Alignment annex (#849)
- Re: [dxwg] Outstanding work for Alignment annex (#849)
[dxwg] new commits pushed by davebrowning
[dxwg] new commits pushed by davebrowning
CNEG subgroup meeting agenda for 2019-03-27
[dxwg] Pull Request: update RDF/XML from turtle file
[dxwg] Pull Request: update RDF/XML from turtle file
[dxwg] new commits pushed by aisaac
DCAT sub-group (April-October schedule)
DCAT sub-group (April-October schedule)
Canceled: DCAT sub-group (November-April schedule).
DCAT sub-group (April-October schedule)
Post-today's call - about PR 841 and issue 642
[dxwg] new commits pushed by davebrowning
[dxwg] new commits pushed by nicholascar
[dxwg] new commits pushed by nicholascar
[dxwg] new commits pushed by nicholascar
[dxwg] new commits pushed by nicholascar
[dxwg] Add mapping schemas to the set of roles (#847)
[dxwg] Pull Request: Relatively minor updates in sections 1 and 2
[dxwg] new commits pushed by aisaac
[dxwg] Pull Request: Editorial change
[dxwg] Pull Request: Editorial change
Plenary agenda March 26
[dxwg] Axiomitise transitivity of dct:conformsTo through isProfileOf relationships (#844)
Re: [dxwg] profile ontology: rdfs:Class vs owl:Class inconsistency between turtle and document (#483)
Closed: [dxwg] profile ontology: rdfs:Class vs owl:Class inconsistency between turtle and document (#483)
[dxwg] Pull Request: Fixed syntax bug
[dxwg] Pull Request: Fixed syntax bug
[dxwg] Pull Request: update issue reference
DCAT sub-group meeting times post-March (timezone)
DCAT Implementation in Qri?
[dxwg] Replace isInheritedFrom with a subproperty of rdfs:isDefinedBy (#842)
[dxwg] Pull Request: update issue reference
[dxwg] Consider naming conventions for instances to make examples easier to read (#840)
[dxwg] Pull Request: Dcat deleting issues riccardo
[dxwg] Pull Request: Dcat deleting issues riccardo
[dxwg] Cleaning the CR from references to backlogged and open issues (#838)
[dxwg] Mentioning the Backlog in the DCAT CR (#837)
Re: [dxwg] Rename Resource Descriptor class (#573)
- Re: [dxwg] Rename Resource Descriptor class (#573)
- Re: [dxwg] Rename Resource Descriptor class (#573)
- Re: [dxwg] Rename Resource Descriptor class (#573)
- Re: [dxwg] Rename Resource Descriptor class (#573)
- Re: [dxwg] Rename Resource Descriptor class (#573)
- Re: [dxwg] Rename Resource Descriptor class (#573)
- Re: [dxwg] Rename Resource Descriptor class (#573)
- Re: [dxwg] Rename Resource Descriptor class (#573)
- Re: [dxwg] Rename Resource Descriptor class (#573)
[dxwg] Pull Request: Text for Security and Privacy Section
[dxwg] Pull Request: Text for Security and Privacy Section
- Re: [dxwg] Text for Security and Privacy Section (#836)
- Re: [dxwg] Text for Security and Privacy Section (#836)
- Re: [dxwg] Text for Security and Privacy Section (#836)
- Re: [dxwg] Text for Security and Privacy Section (#836)
- Re: [dxwg] Text for Security and Privacy Section (#836)
- Re: [dxwg] Text for Security and Privacy Section (#836)
- Re: [dxwg] Text for Security and Privacy Section (#836)
[dxwg] Pull Request: an attempt to include instruction on how DCAT implementations will be…
Re: [dxwg] prof:inheritedFrom needs more convincing case and/or example (#642)
- Re: [dxwg] prof:inheritedFrom needs more convincing case and/or example (#642)
- Re: [dxwg] prof:inheritedFrom needs more convincing case and/or example (#642)
- Re: [dxwg] prof:inheritedFrom needs more convincing case and/or example (#642)
- Re: [dxwg] prof:inheritedFrom needs more convincing case and/or example (#642)
- Re: [dxwg] prof:inheritedFrom needs more convincing case and/or example (#642)
- Re: [dxwg] prof:inheritedFrom needs more convincing case and/or example (#642)
- Re: [dxwg] prof:inheritedFrom needs more convincing case and/or example (#642)
- Re: [dxwg] prof:inheritedFrom needs more convincing case and/or example (#642)
- Re: [dxwg] prof:inheritedFrom needs more convincing case and/or example (#642)
- Re: [dxwg] prof:inheritedFrom needs more convincing case and/or example (#642)
- Re: [dxwg] prof:inheritedFrom needs more convincing case and/or example (#642)
- Re: [dxwg] prof:inheritedFrom needs more convincing case and/or example (#642)
[dxwg] Returning profile list in HTTP response message body (#835)
[dxwg] Pull Request: an attempt to include instruction on how DCAT implementations will be…
[dxwg] new commits pushed by dr-shorthair
[dxwg] Pull Request: (Further) Clarifying notes about distribution
Note on PR approval process and responsibilities
[Reminder] Call for Exclusions: The Profiles Ontology
[Reminder] Call for Exclusions: Content Negotiation by Profile
Poll for f2f at TPAC September 2019
[dxwg] Pull Request: motivation section includes links to UCR sections
[dxwg] Pull Request: motivation section includes links to UCR sections
[dxwg] Pull Request: Updated PROF alignments, as per DXWG wiki
dxwg-ACTION-319: Correct proposal to reference pull requests not commits
[dxwg] Pull Request: (Further) Clarifying notes about distribution
- Re: [dxwg] (Further) Clarifying notes about distribution (#832)
- Re: [dxwg] (Further) Clarifying notes about distribution (#832)
- Re: [dxwg] (Further) Clarifying notes about distribution (#832)
Time changes - April 2
Re: [dxwg] Query string implementation of profile selection (#544)
[dxwg] new commits pushed by nicholascar
[dxwg] Pull Request: fixing implementationReportURI & testSuiteURI
[dxwg] Pull Request: fixing implementationReportURI & testSuiteURI
Plenary tomorrow?
[dxwg] new commits pushed by nicholascar
[dxwg] Pull Request: Prof examples
[dxwg] Pull Request: Prof examples
- Re: [dxwg] Pull Request: Prof examples
- Re: [dxwg] Prof examples (#830)
- Re: [dxwg] Prof examples (#830)
[dxwg] Pull Request: Updates to section 1, 2 (intro) and 2.1 for call Feb 2019
- Re: [dxwg] Updates to section 1, 2 (intro) 2.1 and A.2 for call Feb 2019 (#829)
- Re: [dxwg] Updates to section 1, 2 (intro) 2.1 and A.2 for call Feb 2019 (#829)
[dxwg] Pull Request: Updates to section 1, 2 (intro) and 2.1 for call Feb 2019
Re: [dxwg] Removing reference to issue 72 (#779)
[dxwg] Pull Request: updated alignments, as per DXWG wiki
- Re: [dxwg] Updated PROF alignments, as per DXWG wiki (#828)
- Re: [dxwg] Updated PROF alignments, as per DXWG wiki (#828)
- Re: [dxwg] Updated PROF alignments, as per DXWG wiki (#828)
- Re: [dxwg] Updated PROF alignments, as per DXWG wiki (#828)
- Re: [dxwg] Updated PROF alignments, as per DXWG wiki (#828)
[dxwg] Pull Request: Prof defns
- Re: [dxwg] Pull Request: Prof defns
- Re: [dxwg] Prof defns (#827)
- Re: [dxwg] Prof defns (#827)
- Re: [dxwg] Prof defns (#827)
- Re: [dxwg] Prof defns (#827)
- Re: [dxwg] Prof defns (#827)
- Re: [dxwg] Prof defns (#827)
- Re: [dxwg] Prof defns (#827)
- Re: [dxwg] Prof defns (#827)
- Re: [dxwg] Prof defns (#827)
- Re: [dxwg] Prof defns (#827)
- Re: [dxwg] Prof defns (#827)
- Re: [dxwg] Prof defns (#827)
- Re: [dxwg] Prof defns (#827)
- Re: [dxwg] Prof defns (#827)
- Re: [dxwg] Prof defns (#827)
- Re: [dxwg] Prof defns (#827)
[dxwg] Pull Request: Prof defns
prof:profileOf sub-property of prov:wasDerivedFrom
Closed: [dxwg] Alejandra's profiles ont doc edits (#571)
Closed: [dxwg] Remove prof:BaseSpecification (#641)
Closed: [dxwg] Update Roles vocab and publish W3C styling (#535)
Closed: [dxwg] Update all example RDF and image files (#658)
Re: [dxwg] Update all example RDF and image files (#658)
Closed: [dxwg] Change name from Profiles Ontology to Profiles Vocabulary (#758)
Closed: [dxwg] Link to the Resource Roles vocab in the Profiles Ont doc (#536)
Closed: [dxwg] Harmonise property labels (#534)
Re: [dxwg] Harmonise property labels (#534)
Closed: [dxwg] Profile description model and vocabulary (#323)
[dxwg] Generalise diagrams (#826)
Closed: [dxwg] Illustrate transitivity with diagrams (#520)
Re: [dxwg] Consider HTTP 300 as realization for list profiles / list tokens (#549)
Classes in Fig 1 in PROF
[dxwg] Pull Request: Added changes section
[dxwg] Pull Request: editorial work on first c.300 lines
[dxwg] Pull Request: Remove DataDistributionService
[dxwg] Pull Request: Remove DataDistributionService
- Re: [dxwg] Remove DataDistributionService (#825)
- Re: [dxwg] Remove DataDistributionService (#825)
- Re: [dxwg] Remove DataDistributionService (#825)
- Re: [dxwg] Remove DataDistributionService (#825)
- Re: [dxwg] Remove DataDistributionService (#825)
- Re: [dxwg] Remove DataDistributionService (#825)
- Re: [dxwg] Remove DataDistributionService (#825)
- Re: [dxwg] Remove DataDistributionService (#825)
- Re: [dxwg] Remove DataDistributionService (#825)
- Re: [dxwg] Remove DataDistributionService (#825)
- Re: [dxwg] Remove DataDistributionService (#825)
- Re: [dxwg] Remove DataDistributionService (#825)
- Re: [dxwg] Remove DataDistributionService (#825)
[dxwg] new commits pushed by dr-shorthair
[dxwg] Pull Request: Dcat implementing data service resolution
[dxwg] Pull Request: Dcat implementing data service resolution
[dxwg] Pull Request: editorial work on first c.300 lines
Closed: [dxwg] Add void:rootResource as property of dcat:Resource ? (#292)
[dxwg] new commits pushed by davebrowning
[dxwg] Pull Request: Move schema.org alignment to annexe
[dxwg] Pull Request: Move schema.org alignment to annexe
Re: [dxwg] Draft of sentence addressing issues #90 and #93 about versions (#780)
Fwd: W3C TPAC 2019 - Will your Community Group meet in Fukuoka?
[dxwg] remove dcat:DataDistributionService as separate class, move properties and links to dcat:DataService (#821)
- Re: [dxwg] remove dcat:DataDistributionService as separate class, move properties and links to dcat:DataService (#821)
- Re: [dxwg] remove dcat:DataDistributionService as separate class, move properties and links to dcat:DataService (#821)
[dxwg] add Info on how adequate DCAT implementation experience will be demonstrated (#820)
[dxwg] Pull Request: Contributors & Editors (DCAT) spec
[dxwg] Pull Request: Removing reference to issue 72
[dxwg] Pull Request: Draft of sentence addressing issues #90 and #93 about versions
[dxwg] Pull Request: Conneg ap merge list tokens
[dxwg] new commits pushed by larsgsvensson
[dxwg] Pull Request: Update index.html
[dxwg] Pull Request: Update index.html
Re: [dxwg] Add void:rootResource as property of dcat:Resource ? (#292)
- Re: [dxwg] Add void:rootResource as property of dcat:Resource ? (#292)
- Re: [dxwg] Add void:rootResource as property of dcat:Resource ? (#292)
[dxwg] Pull Request: Purge closed issue notes &
[dxwg] Pull Request: Purge closed issue notes &
[dxwg] Pull Request: Correct example marking..
[dxwg] new commits pushed by davebrowning
[dxwg] Pull Request: PR for dataAPI work/discussions - Do not merge
[dxwg] Pull Request: PR for dataAPI work/discussions - Do not merge
Re: [dxwg] Justify the use of opaque URIs for profiles (#663)
Emails on the WG list referring to actions are not picked up by the tracker
- Re: Emails on the WG list referring to actions are not picked up by the tracker
- Re: Emails on the WG list referring to actions are not picked up by the tracker
FW: ACTION-313: Ping nick about action-291 (Dataset Exchange Working Group)
Re: [dxwg] Profile guidance definitions (#418)
Re: [dxwg] DataService and DataDistributionService (#432)
[dxwg] Pull Request: Conneg ap merge list tokens
dxwg-ACTION-318: Remove closed issues from the connec ed document
[dxwg] new commits pushed by rob-metalinkage
dxwg-ACTION-317: Remove the "list tokens" part from the ed since that's not necessary any more
[dxwg] new commits pushed by rob-metalinkage
dxwg-ACTION-316: Review the implications of profile transitivity wrt to ietf document
Re: [dxwg] Web browser navigation of profile information (#239)
Closed: [dxwg] Profiles listing [RPFL] (#73)
Closed: [dxwg] A client should be able to discover which profiles are supported by a server, and with which content types or other properties, in order to receive the representation most appropriate for their use. (#285)
Re: [dxwg] A client should be able to discover which profiles are supported by a server, and with which content types or other properties, in order to receive the representation most appropriate for their use. (#285)
Re: [dxwg] A server can indicate that a response conforms to multiple profiles. [ID3] (5.3) (#287)
Closed: [dxwg] A server can indicate that a response conforms to multiple profiles. [ID3] (5.3) (#287)
Closed: [dxwg] Decide on a structure for main conneg doc content (#422)
Re: [dxwg] Do we need to say anything specific about URLs (#592)
Closed: [dxwg] RFC 5988 is obsoleted by RFC 8288 (#632)
dxwg-ACTION-315: Add a proposal for url length into #592
Closed: [dxwg] Differentiate profile parameter and Accept-Profile header (#662)
dxwg-ACTION-314: Talk to systems team since emails from the list
dxwg-ACTION-313: Ping nick about action-291
dxwg-ACTION-312: Create an issue for sequence diagram
[dxwg] Pull Request: Added sections for acknowledgements and changes
[dxwg] Pull Request: Added sections for acknowledgements and changes
Re: [dxwg] Decide on a structure for main conneg doc content (#422)
Agenda for CNEG meeting 2019-03-13
Re: [dxwg] A short token to specify a profile may be used as long as there is a discoverable mapping from it to the profile's identifying URI [ID5] (5.5) (#290)
- Re: [dxwg] A short token to specify a profile may be used as long as there is a discoverable mapping from it to the profile's identifying URI [ID5] (5.5) (#290)
- Re: [dxwg] A short token to specify a profile may be used as long as there is a discoverable mapping from it to the profile's identifying URI [ID5] (5.5) (#290)
- Re: [dxwg] A short token to specify a profile may be used as long as there is a discoverable mapping from it to the profile's identifying URI [ID5] (5.5) (#290)
[dxwg] Pull Request: Update index.html
[dxwg] Pull Request: Update index.html
[dxwg] new commits pushed by rob-metalinkage
Closed: [dxwg] Privacy concern with profile negotiation (#782)
[dxwg] new commits pushed by rob-metalinkage
Closed: [dxwg] Reference ARK (#514)
[dxwg] Pull Request: Added changes section
Re: [dxwg] Conceptual model: Profile: class vs. property (#716)
Closed: [dxwg] Create generic properties such as "hasExpression" or "documentedIn" instead of hasResource/(hasRole | hasArtifact) (#747)
Re: [dxwg] Create generic properties such as "hasExpression" or "documentedIn" instead of hasResource/(hasRole | hasArtifact) (#747)
Re: [dxwg] A profile can have multiple base specifications [ID37] (5.37) (#268)
- Re: [dxwg] A profile can have multiple base specifications [ID37] (5.37) (#268)
- Re: [dxwg] A profile can have multiple base specifications [ID37] (5.37) (#268)
- Re: [dxwg] A profile can have multiple base specifications [ID37] (5.37) (#268)
- Re: [dxwg] A profile can have multiple base specifications [ID37] (5.37) (#268)
Closed: [dxwg] A profile can have multiple base specifications [ID37] (5.37) (#268)
dxwg-ACTION-311: Add the list to the document, following the model used in the css working group.
Closed: [dxwg] Clarify definition of dct:accrualPeriodicity in the context of DCAT (#728)
[dxwg] new commits pushed by agbeltran
Round-up of open and closed issues
Re: [dxwg] Missing reference to [DX-PROF-CONNEG] (#739)
[profgui] Ready for another sprint?
Roles in PROF
Plenary agenda, March 12 2019
- Re: Plenary agenda, March 12 2019
- Re: Plenary agenda, March 12 2019
- RE: Plenary agenda, March 12 2019
Re: [dxwg] Usage notes [RUN] (#86)
- Re: [dxwg] Usage notes [RUN] (#86)
- Re: [dxwg] Usage notes [RUN] (#86)
- Re: [dxwg] Usage notes [RUN] (#86)
- Re: [dxwg] Usage notes [RUN] (#86)
- Re: [dxwg] Usage notes [RUN] (#86)
- Re: [dxwg] Usage notes [RUN] (#86)
- Re: [dxwg] Usage notes [RUN] (#86)
- Re: [dxwg] Usage notes [RUN] (#86)
- Re: [dxwg] Usage notes [RUN] (#86)
- Re: [dxwg] Usage notes [RUN] (#86)
- Re: [dxwg] Usage notes [RUN] (#86)
predicate to indicate a SPARQL query used to generate a dataset
[dxwg] new commits pushed by rob-metalinkage
[dxwg] new commits pushed by rob-metalinkage
[dxwg] new commits pushed by rob-metalinkage
[dxwg] Pull Request: Roles
[dxwg] Pull Request: Roles
[dxwg] Introduce mappingFrom and mappingTo properties (#810)
[dxwg] Distribution vs DataDistributionService (#809)
- Re: [dxwg] Distribution vs DataDistributionService (#809)
- Re: [dxwg] Distribution vs DataDistributionService (#809)
- Re: [dxwg] Distribution vs DataDistributionService (#809)
[dxwg] Formally align PROF to DCAT (#808)
- Re: [dxwg] Formally align PROF to DCAT (#808)
- Re: [dxwg] Formally align PROF to DCAT (#808)
- Re: [dxwg] Formally align PROF to DCAT (#808)
dxwg-ACTION-310: Draft a proposal to addres https://â??github.com/â??w3c/â??dxwg/â??issues/â??85
dxwg-ACTION-309: Work out a proposal to address https://â??github.com/â??w3c/â??dxwg/â??issues/â??83
[dxwg] Pull Request: Implementing proposal 1 to address #85
[dxwg] Pull Request: Implementing proposal 1 to address #85
[dxwg] Examples for dataset series (#806)
[dxwg] Pull Request: Annette dataservices
Re: [dxwg] Indicate a conventional way to automatically validate data instances of application profiles (#698)
- Re: [dxwg] Indicate a conventional way to automatically validate data instances of application profiles (#698)
- Re: [dxwg] Indicate a conventional way to automatically validate data instances of application profiles (#698)
- Re: [dxwg] Indicate a conventional way to automatically validate data instances of application profiles (#698)
- Re: [dxwg] Indicate a conventional way to automatically validate data instances of application profiles (#698)
[dxwg] Pull Request: Annette dataservices
Re: [dxwg] Temporal coverage [RTC] (#85)
- Re: [dxwg] Temporal coverage [RTC] (#85)
- Re: [dxwg] Temporal coverage [RTC] (#85)
- Re: [dxwg] Temporal coverage [RTC] (#85)
- Re: [dxwg] Temporal coverage [RTC] (#85)
- Re: [dxwg] Temporal coverage [RTC] (#85)
[dxwg] Pull Request: Addressing comments in Issue 689
[dxwg] Pull Request: Addressing comments in Issue 689
Re: [dxwg] Datasets vs. Catalog relation [RDSCR] (#62)
[dxwg] Pull Request: Draft PR to address the Dataset publications [RDSP] requirement
Re: [dxwg] Distinguish query and item access semantics [RDISA] (#145)
[dxwg] Pull Request: Draft PR to address the Dataset publications [RDSP] requirement
Re: [dxwg] Dataset publications [RDSP] (#63)
[dxwg] Does "profile of" require all or some elements? (#802)
- Re: [dxwg] Does "profile of" require all or some elements? (#802)
- Re: [dxwg] Does "profile of" require all or some elements? (#802)
- Re: [dxwg] Does "profile of" require all or some elements? (#802)
- Re: [dxwg] Does "profile of" require all or some elements? (#802)
- Re: [dxwg] Does "profile of" require all or some elements? (#802)
- Re: [dxwg] Does "profile of" require all or some elements? (#802)
- Re: [dxwg] Does "profile of" require all or some elements? (#802)
- Re: [dxwg] Does "profile of" require all or some elements? (#802)
- Re: [dxwg] Does "profile of" require all or some elements? (#802)
- Re: [dxwg] Does "profile of" require all or some elements? (#802)
- Re: [dxwg] Does "profile of" require all or some elements? (#802)
- Re: [dxwg] Does "profile of" require all or some elements? (#802)
- Re: [dxwg] Does "profile of" require all or some elements? (#802)
- Re: [dxwg] Does "profile of" require all or some elements? (#802)
- Re: [dxwg] Does "profile of" require all or some elements? (#802)
- Re: [dxwg] Does "profile of" require all or some elements? (#802)
- Re: [dxwg] Does "profile of" require all or some elements? (#802)
- Re: [dxwg] Does "profile of" require all or some elements? (#802)
- Re: [dxwg] Does "profile of" require all or some elements? (#802)
- Re: [dxwg] Does "profile of" require all or some elements? (#802)
- Re: [dxwg] Does "profile of" require all or some elements? (#802)
- Re: [dxwg] Does "profile of" require all or some elements? (#802)
- Re: [dxwg] Does "profile of" require all or some elements? (#802)
- Re: [dxwg] Does "profile of" require all or some elements? (#802)
- Re: [dxwg] Does "profile of" require all or some elements? (#802)
- Re: [dxwg] Does "profile of" require all or some elements? (#802)
- Re: [dxwg] Does "profile of" require all or some elements? (#802)
- Re: [dxwg] Does "profile of" require all or some elements? (#802)
- Re: [dxwg] Does "profile of" require all or some elements? (#802)
- Re: [dxwg] Does "profile of" require all or some elements? (#802)
- Re: [dxwg] Does "profile of" require all or some elements? (#802)
- Re: [dxwg] Does "profile of" require all or some elements? (#802)
- Re: [dxwg] Does "profile of" require all or some elements? (#802)
- Re: [dxwg] Does "profile of" require all or some elements? (#802)
- Re: [dxwg] Does "profile of" require all or some elements? (#802)
- Re: [dxwg] Does "profile of" require all or some elements? (#802)
[dxwg] SHACL: clarification of "partially" and ConformanceTest (#801)
- Re: [dxwg] SHACL: clarification of "partially" and ConformanceTest (#801)
- Re: [dxwg] SHACL: clarification of "partially" and ConformanceTest (#801)
[dxwg] From SHACL: profiles based on same ontology (#800)
- Re: [dxwg] From SHACL: profiles based on same ontology (#800)
- Re: [dxwg] From SHACL: profiles based on same ontology (#800)
- Re: [dxwg] From SHACL: profiles based on same ontology (#800)
[dxwg] From SHACL: profile and "base ontology" (#799)
- Re: [dxwg] From SHACL: profile and "base ontology" (#799)
- Re: [dxwg] From SHACL: profile and "base ontology" (#799)
[dxwg] PROF namespace in document (#798)
[dxwg] PROF relationship to other vocabularies (#797)
dxwg-ACTION-308: Bring proposal for DCAT/PROF to group for decision
PROF and relation to DCAT
Working on PROF definitions
[dxwg] Machine understanding of "profile" (#796)
[dxwg] Comments on "inheritance" (#795)
[dxwg] ShEx community comment on resource descriptor (#794)
[dxwg] Pull Request: Update index.html
[dxwg] Pull Request: Update index.html
[dxwg] Use of "standard" (#792)
- Re: [dxwg] Use of "standard" (#792)
- Re: [dxwg] Use of "standard" (#792)
- Re: [dxwg] Use of "standard" (#792)
- Re: [dxwg] Use of "standard" (#792)
- Re: [dxwg] Use of "standard" (#792)
- Re: [dxwg] Use of "standard" (#792)
- Re: [dxwg] Use of "standard" (#792)
- Re: [dxwg] Use of "standard" (#792)
- Re: [dxwg] Use of "standard" (#792)
- Re: [dxwg] Use of "standard" (#792)
- Re: [dxwg] Use of "standard" (#792)
- Re: [dxwg] Use of "standard" (#792)
Re: [dxwg] Visual clues in Figures 3 and 4 (#689)
- Re: [dxwg] Visual clues in Figures 3 and 4 (#689)
- Re: [dxwg] Visual clues in Figures 3 and 4 (#689)
- Re: [dxwg] Visual clues in Figures 3 and 4 (#689)
Prof Voc Sprint with Agenda
Re: [dxwg] Definitions in Profiles Ontology (#755)
- Re: [dxwg] Definitions in Profiles Ontology (#755)
- Re: [dxwg] Definitions in Profiles Ontology (#755)
- Re: [dxwg] Definitions in Profiles Ontology (#755)
- Re: [dxwg] Definitions in Profiles Ontology (#755)
- Re: [dxwg] Definitions in Profiles Ontology (#755)
- Re: [dxwg] Definitions in Profiles Ontology (#755)
- Re: [dxwg] Definitions in Profiles Ontology (#755)
- Re: [dxwg] Definitions in Profiles Ontology (#755)
- Re: [dxwg] Definitions in Profiles Ontology (#755)
- Re: [dxwg] Definitions in Profiles Ontology (#755)
- Re: [dxwg] Definitions in Profiles Ontology (#755)
- Re: [dxwg] Definitions in Profiles Ontology (#755)
Re: [dxwg] Update Roles vocab and publish W3C styling (#535)
- Re: [dxwg] Update Roles vocab and publish W3C styling (#535)
- Re: [dxwg] Update Roles vocab and publish W3C styling (#535)
- Re: [dxwg] Update Roles vocab and publish W3C styling (#535)
- Re: [dxwg] Update Roles vocab and publish W3C styling (#535)
Re: [dxwg] prof:profileOf sub-property of prov:wasDerivedFrom (!?) (#485)
- Re: [dxwg] prof:profileOf sub-property of prov:wasDerivedFrom (!?) (#485)
- Re: [dxwg] prof:profileOf sub-property of prov:wasDerivedFrom (!?) (#485)
- Re: [dxwg] prof:profileOf sub-property of prov:wasDerivedFrom (!?) (#485)
- Re: [dxwg] prof:profileOf sub-property of prov:wasDerivedFrom (!?) (#485)
- Re: [dxwg] prof:profileOf sub-property of prov:wasDerivedFrom (!?) (#485)
- Re: [dxwg] prof:profileOf sub-property of prov:wasDerivedFrom (!?) (#485)
- Re: [dxwg] prof:profileOf sub-property of prov:wasDerivedFrom (!?) (#485)
[dxwg] PROF Voc & OGC Testbed 14: Characterization of RDF Application Profiles (#791)
[dxwg] Pull Request: Issue 731
[dxwg] Pull Request: Issue 731
Closed: [dxwg] Consider use of adms:identifier instead of prof:token (#453)
Re: [dxwg] Consider use of adms:identifier instead of prof:token (#453)
- Re: [dxwg] Consider use of adms:identifier instead of prof:token (#453)
- Re: [dxwg] Consider use of adms:identifier instead of prof:token (#453)
- Re: [dxwg] Consider use of adms:identifier instead of prof:token (#453)
DCAT sub-group call
[dxwg] Pull Request: Further clarification for distributions
[dxwg] Pull Request: Further clarification for distributions
- Re: [dxwg] Further clarification for distributions (#789)
- Re: [dxwg] Further clarification for distributions (#789)
- Re: [dxwg] Further clarification for distributions (#789)
- Re: [dxwg] Further clarification for distributions (#789)
- Re: [dxwg] Further clarification for distributions (#789)
- Re: [dxwg] Further clarification for distributions (#789)
- Re: [dxwg] Further clarification for distributions (#789)
- Re: [dxwg] Further clarification for distributions (#789)
- Re: [dxwg] Further clarification for distributions (#789)
- Re: [dxwg] Further clarification for distributions (#789)
- Re: [dxwg] Further clarification for distributions (#789)
- Re: [dxwg] Further clarification for distributions (#789)
- Re: [dxwg] Further clarification for distributions (#789)
- Re: [dxwg] Further clarification for distributions (#789)
- Re: [dxwg] Further clarification for distributions (#789)
- Re: [dxwg] Further clarification for distributions (#789)
- Re: [dxwg] Further clarification for distributions (#789)
- Re: [dxwg] Further clarification for distributions (#789)
- Re: [dxwg] Further clarification for distributions (#789)
- Re: [dxwg] Further clarification for distributions (#789)
- Re: [dxwg] Further clarification for distributions (#789)
- Re: [dxwg] Further clarification for distributions (#789)
- Re: [dxwg] Further clarification for distributions (#789)
[dxwg] Determine roles and role descriptions for profile resources (#788)
- Re: [dxwg] Determine roles and role descriptions for profile resources (#788)
- Re: [dxwg] Determine roles and role descriptions for profile resources (#788)
- Re: [dxwg] Determine roles and role descriptions for profile resources (#788)
- Re: [dxwg] Determine roles and role descriptions for profile resources (#788)
- Closed: [dxwg] Determine roles and role descriptions for profile resources (#788)
- Re: [dxwg] Determine roles and role descriptions for profile resources (#788)
dxwg-ACTION-307: Open new issue seeded with list of roles and definitions and ask for comment
Issue 544 review
Re: [dxwg] Collecting implementation evidence for DCAT-2 (#767)
- Re: [dxwg] Collecting implementation evidence for DCAT-2 (#767)
- Re: [dxwg] Collecting implementation evidence for DCAT-2 (#767)
- Re: [dxwg] Collecting implementation evidence for DCAT-2 (#767)
- Re: [dxwg] Collecting implementation evidence for DCAT-2 (#767)
- Re: [dxwg] Collecting implementation evidence for DCAT-2 (#767)
Re: [dxwg] Examples of quality for services (#252)
Re: [dxwg] Registration of target attribute "profile" for the Link-Header (#501)
Profiles Vocab sprint this week - choose time?
- Re: Profiles Vocab sprint this week - choose time?
- Re: Profiles Vocab sprint this week - choose time?
Re: [dxwg] Polish translation (#705)
Re: [dxwg] RFC 5988 is obsoleted by RFC 8288 (#632)
Closed: [dxwg] use standard for profile identification (#45)
[dxwg] new commits pushed by rob-metalinkage
Re: [dxwg] DCAT: Check normative references (#702)
Re: [dxwg] UCR: Editorial issues (#683)
FYI - Fwd: Agenda Review Meeting and Agenda Meeting with POs from LSPs 11 March 2019
Re: [dxwg] Spatial coverage [RSC] (#83)
- Re: [dxwg] Spatial coverage [RSC] (#83)
- Re: [dxwg] Spatial coverage [RSC] (#83)
- Re: [dxwg] Spatial coverage [RSC] (#83)
- Re: [dxwg] Spatial coverage [RSC] (#83)
- Re: [dxwg] Spatial coverage [RSC] (#83)
Re: [dxwg] Version subject [RVSS] (#93)
Re: [dxwg] Returning profiles for QSA queries (#679)
- Re: [dxwg] Returning profiles for QSA queries (#679)
- Re: [dxwg] Returning profiles for QSA queries (#679)
Re: [dxwg] Profiles Ontology Figure 3 (#731)
- Re: [dxwg] Profiles Ontology Figure 3 (#731)
- Re: [dxwg] Profiles Ontology Figure 3 (#731)
- Re: [dxwg] Profiles Ontology Figure 3 (#731)
- Re: [dxwg] Profiles Ontology Figure 3 (#731)
- Re: [dxwg] Profiles Ontology Figure 3 (#731)
- Re: [dxwg] Profiles Ontology Figure 3 (#731)
- Re: [dxwg] Profiles Ontology Figure 3 (#731)
- Re: [dxwg] Profiles Ontology Figure 3 (#731)
- Re: [dxwg] Profiles Ontology Figure 3 (#731)
- Re: [dxwg] Profiles Ontology Figure 3 (#731)
- Re: [dxwg] Profiles Ontology Figure 3 (#731)
- Re: [dxwg] Profiles Ontology Figure 3 (#731)
- Re: [dxwg] Profiles Ontology Figure 3 (#731)
- Re: [dxwg] Profiles Ontology Figure 3 (#731)
- Re: [dxwg] Profiles Ontology Figure 3 (#731)
- Re: [dxwg] Profiles Ontology Figure 3 (#731)
- Re: [dxwg] Profiles Ontology Figure 3 (#731)
- Re: [dxwg] Profiles Ontology Figure 3 (#731)
ProfGui again this thursday?
Plenary Agenda March 5
[dxwg] Pull Request: Update index.html
[dxwg] Pull Request: Update index.html
[dxwg] new commits pushed by larsgsvensson
Re: DCAT sprint on implementation report next week - please complete doodle poll
Re: [dxwg] ID25 to be revised (#9)
- Re: [dxwg] ID25 to be revised (#9)
- Re: [dxwg] ID25 to be revised (#9)
- Re: [dxwg] ID25 to be revised (#9)
- Re: [dxwg] ID25 to be revised (#9)
- Re: [dxwg] ID25 to be revised (#9)
- Re: [dxwg] ID25 to be revised (#9)
- Re: [dxwg] ID25 to be revised (#9)
Re: [dxwg] add RFC 6906 to profiles ontology (#629)
Re: [dxwg] use standard for profile identification (#45)
[dxwg] Pull Request: pneg sprint 2019 02 28
[dxwg] Pull Request: pneg sprint 2019 02 28
[dxwg] List profiles for dynamic resources (#785)
- Re: [dxwg] List profiles for dynamic resources (#785)
- Re: [dxwg] List profiles for dynamic resources (#785)
Re: [dxwg] Returning Accept-Profile in HTTP OPTIONS response (#677)
Re: [dxwg] Are PROF roles misplaced in resourceDescription? (#769)
- Re: [dxwg] Are PROF roles misplaced in resourceDescription? (#769)
- Re: [dxwg] Are PROF roles misplaced in resourceDescription? (#769)
- Re: [dxwg] Are PROF roles misplaced in resourceDescription? (#769)
- Re: [dxwg] Are PROF roles misplaced in resourceDescription? (#769)
- Re: [dxwg] Are PROF roles misplaced in resourceDescription? (#769)
- Re: [dxwg] Are PROF roles misplaced in resourceDescription? (#769)
- Re: [dxwg] Are PROF roles misplaced in resourceDescription? (#769)
- Re: [dxwg] Are PROF roles misplaced in resourceDescription? (#769)
- Re: [dxwg] Are PROF roles misplaced in resourceDescription? (#769)
- Re: [dxwg] Are PROF roles misplaced in resourceDescription? (#769)
- Re: [dxwg] Are PROF roles misplaced in resourceDescription? (#769)
- Re: [dxwg] Are PROF roles misplaced in resourceDescription? (#769)
Re: [dxwg] Clarify the scope of `dct:identifier` (#771)
Re: [dxwg] Summary statistics [RSS] (#84)
- Re: [dxwg] Summary statistics [RSS] (#84)
- Re: [dxwg] Summary statistics [RSS] (#84)
- Re: [dxwg] Summary statistics [RSS] (#84)
- Re: [dxwg] Summary statistics [RSS] (#84)
- Re: [dxwg] Summary statistics [RSS] (#84)
- Re: [dxwg] Summary statistics [RSS] (#84)
[dxwg] new commits pushed by dr-shorthair
[dxwg] new commits pushed by dr-shorthair
[dxwg] new commits pushed by dr-shorthair
[dxwg] new commits pushed by agbeltran
Re: [dxwg] Annette dataservices (#778)
- Re: [dxwg] Annette dataservices (#778)
- Re: [dxwg] Annette dataservices (#778)
- Re: [dxwg] Annette dataservices (#778)
- Re: [dxwg] Annette dataservices (#778)
- Re: [dxwg] Annette dataservices (#778)
- Re: [dxwg] Annette dataservices (#778)
- Re: [dxwg] Annette dataservices (#778)
- Re: [dxwg] Annette dataservices (#778)
- Re: [dxwg] Annette dataservices (#778)
- Re: [dxwg] Annette dataservices (#778)
[dxwg] Pull Request: Annette dataservices
Re: [dxwg] Metadata guidance rules [RMDG] (#69)
[dxwg] Pull Request: DCAT - definition of accrualPeriodicity
- Re: [dxwg] DCAT - definition of accrualPeriodicity (#784)
- Re: [dxwg] DCAT - definition of accrualPeriodicity (#784)
- Re: [dxwg] DCAT - definition of accrualPeriodicity (#784)
- Re: [dxwg] DCAT - definition of accrualPeriodicity (#784)
- Re: [dxwg] DCAT - definition of accrualPeriodicity (#784)
- Re: [dxwg] DCAT - definition of accrualPeriodicity (#784)
- Re: [dxwg] DCAT - definition of accrualPeriodicity (#784)
- Re: [dxwg] DCAT - definition of accrualPeriodicity (#784)
- Re: [dxwg] DCAT - definition of accrualPeriodicity (#784)
[dxwg] Pull Request: DCAT - definition of accrualPeriodicity
[profgui] Definitions needed for progress
Re: [dxwg] Profile definition [RPFDF] (#72)
- Re: [dxwg] Profile definition [RPFDF] (#72)
- Re: [dxwg] Profile definition [RPFDF] (#72)
- Re: [dxwg] Profile definition [RPFDF] (#72)
- Re: [dxwg] Profile definition [RPFDF] (#72)
- Re: [dxwg] Profile definition [RPFDF] (#72)
- Re: [dxwg] Profile definition [RPFDF] (#72)
Re: [dxwg] Differentiate profile parameter and Accept-Profile header (#662)
- Re: [dxwg] Differentiate profile parameter and Accept-Profile header (#662)
- Re: [dxwg] Differentiate profile parameter and Accept-Profile header (#662)
- Re: [dxwg] Differentiate profile parameter and Accept-Profile header (#662)
- Re: [dxwg] Differentiate profile parameter and Accept-Profile header (#662)
Re: [dxwg] Inclusion of POST and PUT methods in content negotiation (#678)
- Re: [dxwg] Inclusion of POST and PUT methods in content negotiation (#678)
- Re: [dxwg] Inclusion of POST and PUT methods in content negotiation (#678)
Re: [dxwg] Clarify definition of dct:accrualPeriodicity in the context of DCAT (#728)
Re: [dxwg] DCAT spatial resolution (#777)
Re: [dxwg] Privacy concern with profile negotiation (#782)
- Re: [dxwg] Privacy concern with profile negotiation (#782)
- Re: [dxwg] Privacy concern with profile negotiation (#782)
- Re: [dxwg] Privacy concern with profile negotiation (#782)
[dxwg] Pull Request: Add ARK to related work
[dxwg] Pull Request: Add ARK to related work
Re: [dxwg] Reference ARK (#514)
Re: [dxwg] URI type of a profile identifier (#690)
Re: [dxwg] Definition of "Schema" (as opposed to profile) (#195)
Re: [dxwg] Distribution composed of more than one file, but not packaged (#482)
- Re: [dxwg] Distribution composed of more than one file, but not packaged (#482)
- Re: [dxwg] Distribution composed of more than one file, but not packaged (#482)
- Re: [dxwg] Distribution composed of more than one file, but not packaged (#482)
- Re: [dxwg] Distribution composed of more than one file, but not packaged (#482)
- Re: [dxwg] Distribution composed of more than one file, but not packaged (#482)
- Re: [dxwg] Distribution composed of more than one file, but not packaged (#482)
- Re: [dxwg] Distribution composed of more than one file, but not packaged (#482)
- Re: [dxwg] Distribution composed of more than one file, but not packaged (#482)
- Re: [dxwg] Distribution composed of more than one file, but not packaged (#482)
- Re: [dxwg] Distribution composed of more than one file, but not packaged (#482)