W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-dxwg-wg@w3.org > March 2019

Re: [dxwg] Prof defns (#827)

From: kcoyle via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2019 14:57:32 +0000
To: public-dxwg-wg@w3.org
Message-ID: <issue_comment.created-474408351-1553007449-sysbot+gh@w3.org>
Here's an example:

Definition
Current: A Profile has a Resource Descriptor

Makx (Issue 755): An accessible form of the Profile with a certain role in a certain format
Karen (Issue 755): The described profile resource

Proposed: 

A resource which describes the nature of an artifact and the role it plays in relation to a profile

Makx offered some text, I offered some text, and then (unknown) wrote something entirely different and put it in the pull request. Where did this wording come from? Who agreed to it? Did the group working on this even see it before it was added to the document? This is totally out of left field, is not a consensus of the folks commenting - so why is it being put in the document? That's why I object to this change.

-- 
GitHub Notification of comment by kcoyle
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/pull/827#issuecomment-474408351 using your GitHub account
Received on Tuesday, 19 March 2019 14:57:34 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:42:15 UTC