Re: [dxwg] Usage notes [RUN] (#86)

(Already sent by e-mail: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-dxwg-wg/2019Mar/0275.html)

I think we need to be careful. A statement of this kind by an individual has less weight than a statement from organisations like W3C or Dublin Core. A person might not be able to honour that commitment -- as in the case of the Canadian cryptocurrency exchange.

A problem is that the vocab.org site recommends all terms to have URIs in purl.org space, but it looks like they were not moved over when purl.org changed owner. So all of them are basically broken.

Unless we can find a way to un-break the VANN URIs, I don't think we can use them

-- 
GitHub Notification of comment by makxdekkers
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/86#issuecomment-472792256 using your GitHub account

Received on Thursday, 14 March 2019 10:28:46 UTC