W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-dxwg-wg@w3.org > March 2019

Re: [dxwg] Usage notes [RUN] (#86)

From: Andrea Perego via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2019 22:03:28 +0000
To: public-dxwg-wg@w3.org
Message-ID: <issue_comment.created-471754484-1552341805-sysbot+gh@w3.org>
@agbeltran , use conditions are what licences are meant to describe. The purpose of "usage notes" here is to provide guidance on how to use (as well as how not to use) the data, indicate for which types of "experiments" they are fit, and/or advise about possible limitations, errors, etc. So, I don't think ODRL would be fit for this.

About DUV vs. DQV, I would go for the latter in this case. As you said, DUV has been designed to represent feedback on how data is used. However, "usage notes" (in the sense we mean here) is meant to be a statement from data producers, and I see it more strictly related to intrinsic (qualitative) characteristics of the data.

Said that, I still think we should provide first a simple / flat way of specifying usage notes, and go for DQV (or other vocabularies as OA) for more complex cases.

GitHub Notification of comment by andrea-perego
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/86#issuecomment-471754484 using your GitHub account
Received on Monday, 11 March 2019 22:03:37 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:42:15 UTC