- From: Rob Atkinson via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2019 05:34:12 +0000
- To: public-dxwg-wg@w3.org
re "The discussion around inheritance and traversing a graph just to check conformance seems to be introducing barriers to use and to mixing vocabulary from multiple standards." - this is _exactly_ what happens if you import RDFS or OWL axiomitisation. It is a barrier perhaps - but its the responsibility of the chosen set of constraints languages and how they are used that determines if navigation is necessary. The Profiles Vocabulary is agnostic about this choice. It provides the new capability of declaration of intent w.r.t. to conformance in heirarchies however, and this thread has not affected that underlying requirement or the proposed solution, so I think it can be closed as out-of-scope. -- GitHub Notification of comment by rob-metalinkage Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/698#issuecomment-474204350 using your GitHub account
Received on Tuesday, 19 March 2019 05:34:14 UTC