[dxwg] Editorial issues in prof:inheritedFrom example (#858)

aisaac has just created a new issue for https://github.com/w3c/dxwg:

== Editorial issues in prof:inheritedFrom example ==
This is a spin-off from #642 

The statement `1:Standard_X a prof:Profile` may not be wrong, but it does not add anything useful to the example and thus it could be removed. Of course the comment next to it ("this may be a 'null' profile [...]") would go away as well, which as @kocyle pointed, is good for the understanding of the example.

Wrong comments: 
`# RS 2 in diagram` should refer to Resource Descriptor 2
`# RS 3 in diagram` should refer to Resource Descriptor 3

In the diagram, I guess `Profile X, Resource Descriptor 2` should be `Profile Y, Resource Descriptor 2`

@nicholascar @rob-metalinkage I believe that these changes are no-brainers and could be implemented this week if you have time.


Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/858 using your GitHub account

Received on Thursday, 28 March 2019 10:35:49 UTC