- From: Rob Atkinson via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Sun, 24 Mar 2019 22:48:05 +0000
- To: public-dxwg-wg@w3.org
Give the original issue has been addressed with an example, but there is obviously active discussion around the underlying concepts I have created a new issue #842 to address the substantive question - is this property optimally designed, named and described? I have put forward a concrete proposal to allow us to move forward. General issues of DCAT alignment and the nature of inheritance are handled in #769 and #808 and #795 There is a new issue with the key outstanding matter directly arising from this discussion, relating to example naming: #840 https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/pull/841 is s trivial PR to pull this issue in, and replace this issue now that an example is in . consensus needs to be managed with good procedures that keep matters separated, otherwise no one knows what they are agreeing to - so this issue needs to be closed and discussions directed to single-thread replacements. The above outlines where all the discussions should be taking place from now/ So, lets put this forward to a consent process - are there any objections to: 1) Accept PR-841 at the next plenary to get the updated issues into the public arena 2) respondents to check and update the relevant (!) open issues with any outstanding concerns (or open new issues if you believe the concern is not the focus of an existing issue, bearing in mind issues need to focussed on a matter that can actually be resolved. 3) editors make sure that external comments are captured and replied to in the disposition of comments documents maintained by the chairs. NB A vote at the plenary to accept the PR marks a consensus to move forward - and of course the issue persists even after closing so discussion is not lost. -- GitHub Notification of comment by rob-metalinkage Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/642#issuecomment-476009117 using your GitHub account
Received on Sunday, 24 March 2019 22:48:07 UTC