Re: [dxwg] Spatial coverage [RSC] (#83)

Example 2.c seems to have some redundancy: sf:Point and Point(...). Is that necessary?


-- 
GitHub Notification of comment by akuckartz
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/83#issuecomment-470381163 using your GitHub account

Received on Thursday, 7 March 2019 04:34:04 UTC