Re: Profiles Vocab sprint this week - choose time?

One more thing: 21-23:00 UTC, Wednesday 6th overlaps with our usual DCAT
meeting.


On Tue, 5 Mar 2019 at 18:18, Alejandra Gonzalez-Beltran <
alejandra.gonzalez.beltran@gmail.com> wrote:

> I agree with Karen that creating a doodle poll is a good idea - we have
> also other pending meetings such as the DCAT sprint or a profgui meeting so
> availability will depend on those being confirmed.
>
> Thanks
> Alejandra
>
> On Tue, 5 Mar 2019 at 18:06, pedro winstley <pedro.win.stan@googlemail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Hi Nick
>>
>> It is good to get a specific list of activities to work on but I am in
>> Berlin at the W3C graph databases meeting, and Karen has mentioned that she
>> cannot make this.  We/you *need* to ensure that we have several people
>> involved in these drafting sprints, so please can you suggest some other
>> times.  I for one will be more available next week.
>>
>> Best
>>
>> Peter
>>
>> On Tue, 5 Mar 2019 at 12:10, Car, Nicholas (L&W, Dutton Park)
>> <Nicholas.Car@csiro.au> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Rob & I would like to run a sprint this week to grind through some of
>>> the pressing Profiles Vocab issues for a next PWD release, in particular:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>    - Moving some ResourceDescriptor roles from the stand-alone vocab
>>>    into the main vocab
>>>       - We need agreement on the set of roles to move (core/common
>>>       roles)
>>>    - Addressing the use of dct:format for ResourceDescriptors
>>>       - And whether the use of this DCAT pattern means we are really
>>>       cataloguing Distributions of a profile and thus more DCAT semantics
>>>       can/should be used
>>>    - Closing as many issues as possible
>>>       - Especially those tagged with 2PWD:
>>>       https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues?q=is%3Aopen+is%3Aissue+milestone%3A%22PROF+2PWD%22
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> We propose one of the two timeslots for a 2-hour sprint:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> 21-23:00 UTC, Wednesday 6th
>>>
>>> 10-12:00 UTC, Thursday, 7th
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Rob and I can make either time so if people who would like to attend
>>> could please indicate a preference by reply to this (numbers should be
>>> manageable via email, rather than Doodle) then we will go with the most
>>> preferred.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Nick
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>