W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-dxwg-wg@w3.org > March 2019

Re: [dxwg] prof:inheritedFrom needs more convincing case and/or example (#642)

From: kcoyle via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
Date: Thu, 21 Mar 2019 23:07:32 +0000
To: public-dxwg-wg@w3.org
Message-ID: <issue_comment.created-475436290-1553209651-sysbot+gh@w3.org>
@rob-metalinkage "an example has been provided and an update of the definition made. " There were questions about the example that were not answered here. Just providing an example is not enough, there has to be discussion and response, possibly leading to changes. To point of providing an example is that it facilitates discussion. In addition, Richard provided a counter example. How do you want to handle that? Also, @VladimirAlexiev had comments that may need responses. All of these need to be considered.

I also don't know that an update of the definition has been presented to, nor accepted by, the group. That would be a first step in a resolution. This could be done as an email to the public list or, if needed, a new github issue. Then we could ask for a straw poll vote on it, after suitable discussion.

GitHub Notification of comment by kcoyle
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/642#issuecomment-475436290 using your GitHub account
Received on Thursday, 21 March 2019 23:07:34 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:42:15 UTC