- From: Nicholas Car via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 05 Mar 2019 22:53:49 +0000
- To: public-dxwg-wg@w3.org
Original suggestions by @kcoyle: > remove boxes denoting classes. The class'ness is included in the definition of the properties (their domains) I've redrafted the diagram to remove these > resolve the issue of Standard X and "has resource" (the other option is that PROF has to become an ontology for both non-profiled standards as well as profiles) I've bypassed this by just using an example where a Profile inherits a Resource from another Profile, not a Standard. While not incorrect, as @rob-metalinkage says in his first comment, there's no need to specifically bring in that detail into this example so we can reduce complexity here. From @aisaac: >For the record, I've also put some editorial input at #642 (comment) Would it help if it's copied here, or is it ok to leave it there? You can leave the comment there. I think I've addressed all your points in this new release. Comments from @fellahst & @andrea-perego: Important comments but this Issue, 731, is narrow so I'm going to address it here and transfer OGC-related thoughts to another.  This diagram is now in PR https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/pull/790 -- GitHub Notification of comment by nicholascar Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/731#issuecomment-469891913 using your GitHub account
Received on Tuesday, 5 March 2019 22:53:50 UTC