W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-dxwg-wg@w3.org > March 2019

Re: [dxwg] prof:inheritedFrom needs more convincing case and/or example (#642)

From: Rob Atkinson via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2019 00:25:13 +0000
To: public-dxwg-wg@w3.org
Message-ID: <issue_comment.created-475451582-1553214312-sysbot+gh@w3.org>
reread the thread - response has been provided to the points @VladimirAlexiev inline (and a formal response can be made after 2PWD is released to request review).  Stephen's counter example has been considered and discussed. Definitions have been discussed and we have the best we can achieve in this round via three weeks of collaborative editing via the google doc.  You simply need to accept that there is a point at which "the group" has had input via all the formal mechanisms, the impact has been assessed, and in this case improved definitions in a new draft is proposed. This new draft can then be exposed to wider review, which is the only way to resolve things. 

There is an outstanding suggestion re renaming some entities within the example - happy to take this on board as a new issue, as it technically is a different subject to this issue and applies to all examples.

GitHub Notification of comment by rob-metalinkage
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/642#issuecomment-475451582 using your GitHub account
Received on Friday, 22 March 2019 00:25:15 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:42:15 UTC