- From: Andrea Perego via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 04 Mar 2019 21:42:18 +0000
- To: public-dxwg-wg@w3.org
@rob-metalinkage wrote: > The additional semantics of a "schema" seem to be the key area where this work is more specialised than the general solution. The idea of schema mappings is out of scope, but perhaps it is another resource with a different role using the qualified role metamodel of prof:ResourceDescriptor/prof:hasRole I think this could be indeed a useful addition to PROF. IMO, being able to discover if mapping rules are available to transform meta/data between schemas is quite a common use case. -- GitHub Notification of comment by andrea-perego Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/731#issuecomment-469433064 using your GitHub account
Received on Monday, 4 March 2019 21:42:21 UTC