- From: Andrea Perego via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 07 Mar 2019 12:40:11 +0000
- To: public-dxwg-wg@w3.org
@akuckartz said: > Example 2.c seems to have some redundancy: sf:Point and Point(...). Is that necessary? This is how the geometry will be represented and encoded in GeoSPARQL. The type of geometry is specified both at the level of class, and in the WKT (or GML) literal. -- GitHub Notification of comment by andrea-perego Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/83#issuecomment-470510283 using your GitHub account
Received on Thursday, 7 March 2019 12:40:13 UTC