W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-dxwg-wg@w3.org > March 2019

Re: [dxwg] Prof defns (#827)

From: Rob Atkinson via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2019 23:45:35 +0000
To: public-dxwg-wg@w3.org
Message-ID: <issue_comment.created-474627720-1553039133-sysbot+gh@w3.org>
there was a doodle poll, and an announced sprint, as per the action in the plenary, at a typical time slot. We also chose the google doc as a way of making it open, and it has been effective at gathering useful comment. As editors we need to reconcile different suggestions - it wouldnt make sense just to transcribe them all. Largely we have accepted the best wording except where (as explained in comments) the sense was not quite correct -perhaps too general or too specific. At any rate  the suggestions have now been available for some time - we need to snapshot and start again. The PR doesnt reflect an agreed final state - it is a time-dependent snapshot of the best we can do so we can elicit wider feedback ASAP.  Otherwise we are violating (even worse) the W3C policy of publish often, I beleive the temporary google doc approach has allowed participation as intended, and as intended it needs to be wrapped up, and if necessary restarted to allow for wider participation.  

Please follow procedure and accept the PR (providing it matches the state of the google doc - which is explicity the editor's response to comments that have been available for review for over a week - and raise issues for specific definitions you would like to propose further improvements. 

GitHub Notification of comment by rob-metalinkage
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/pull/827#issuecomment-474627720 using your GitHub account
Received on Tuesday, 19 March 2019 23:45:36 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:42:15 UTC