W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-dxwg-wg@w3.org > March 2019

[dxwg] Generalise diagrams (#826)

From: Nicholas Car via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2019 01:55:35 +0000
To: public-dxwg-wg@w3.org
Message-ID: <issues.opened-422005698-1552874134-sysbot+gh@w3.org>
nicholascar has just created a new issue for https://github.com/w3c/dxwg:

== Generalise diagrams ==
Internal comments like [1] and some external ones indicate it's not appropriate to assume all classes in PROF diagrams are OWL classes. They could be RDFS classes and perhaps should be OWL/RDFS non-specific altogether.

Suggested actions:

* generalise PROF diagram keys to remove references to OWL/RDFS
* evaluate diagrams to see if they match 'plain' (non-RDF) diagram expectations (like UML)
  * compare with DCAT & other W3C specs for expectations
* review all diagrams and their keys for consistency

[1] https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-dxwg-wg/2019Mar/0456.html

Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/826 using your GitHub account
Received on Monday, 18 March 2019 01:55:37 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:42:15 UTC