W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-dxwg-wg@w3.org > March 2019

RE: Poll for the publication of the PROF 2nd PWD

From: Cox, Simon (L&W, Clayton) <Simon.Cox@csiro.au>
Date: Sat, 30 Mar 2019 09:51:35 +0000
To: "L.Svensson@dnb.de" <L.Svensson@dnb.de>, "pedro.win.stan@googlemail.com" <pedro.win.stan@googlemail.com>, "public-dxwg-wg@w3.org" <public-dxwg-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <ME2PR01MB33952E3E1750FDB438C34EB3885B0@ME2PR01MB3395.ausprd01.prod.outlook.com>
Drop a class=issue paragraph in drawing attention to the issue(s) where it is still under discussion?

________________________________
From: Svensson, Lars <L.Svensson@dnb.de>
Sent: Saturday, March 30, 2019 7:02:21 AM
To: pedro winstley; Dataset Exchange Working Group
Subject: RE: Poll for the publication of the PROF 2nd PWD

Hi all,

I just submitted a _weak_ „yes“ to publication. I. e. if others are fine, I’m not blocking. That said, I _really_ think we should add a reference to #802 – particularly @smrgeoinfo’s comment [1] – somewhere around prof:isProfileOf/prof:isTransitiveProfileOf [2] just to show that we’re still discussing semantics and terminology of profiling.

[1] https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/802#issuecomment-477243748
[2] https://w3c.github.io/dxwg/profilesont/#Property:isProfileOf

Best,

Lars

From: pedro winstley [mailto:pedro.win.stan@googlemail.com]
Sent: Friday, March 29, 2019 1:40 PM
To: Dataset Exchange Working Group <public-dxwg-wg@w3.org>
Subject: Poll for the publication of the PROF 2nd PWD

Dear WG members

Please can you reply to the following poll at your earliest convenience.

https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/99375/PROF2PWD/

Kind regards

Karen & Peter : Chairs
Received on Saturday, 30 March 2019 09:52:08 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:42:15 UTC