W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-dxwg-wg@w3.org > March 2019

Re: [dxwg] Further clarification for distributions (#789)

From: Simon Cox via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
Date: Sat, 16 Mar 2019 01:15:41 +0000
To: public-dxwg-wg@w3.org
Message-ID: <issue_comment.created-473485290-1552698940-sysbot+gh@w3.org>
@smrgeoinfo you might be right about 'Data Series' - this is perhaps a common application (I know it has its own slot in ISO 19115, for example). Perhaps you could write a new UC for this and we can put it on the backlog for the next (soon) revision. 

But in general I agree with the original intention that different years-worth would typically correspond with different datasets. It's just that these datasets have a rather predictable relationship between them - i.e. they are part of a series in which only (e.g.) the temporal extent is different. We do have a general mechanism to deal with 'relationships between datasets' (i.e. qualified relations) but data-series is probably a special case that is worth giving special treatment. 

GitHub Notification of comment by dr-shorthair
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/pull/789#issuecomment-473485290 using your GitHub account
Received on Saturday, 16 March 2019 01:15:42 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:42:15 UTC