- From: aisaac via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 28 Mar 2019 10:38:15 +0000
- To: public-dxwg-wg@w3.org
I have added back the 'due for closing' A lot of comments and suggestion do indeed seem to cover the relationship with DCAT or even more generally the pattern for resource descriptors, artefacts, i.e. something much broader than inheritance. And/or they are based on a misunderstanding of a version of the example that was easier to misunderstand then. I have created two new issues which I think are not covered in the other issues mentioned above: - one of the level at which the inheritance statement should be represented: #857 - one for editorial fixes #858 Based on my comment at https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-dxwg-wg/2019Mar/0676.html I now believe that with PR #841 can be merged and this issue can be closed. -- GitHub Notification of comment by aisaac Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/642#issuecomment-477540423 using your GitHub account
Received on Thursday, 28 March 2019 10:38:16 UTC