public-dwbp-wg@w3.org from January 2015 by author

Adriano C. Machado Pereira

• Re: dwbp-ACTION-114: Complete use case and requirements for data enrichment. related to issue-72 (Friday, 23 January)
• Re: dwbp-ACTION-114: Complete use case and requirements for data enrichment. related to issue-72 (Friday, 16 January)
• Re: dwbp-ISSUE-119 (BernadetteLoscio): Data Consumer x Data User [Best practices document(s)] (Wednesday, 14 January)
• Re: Call for comments on open questions about the audience for the DWBP doc (Thursday, 8 January)

Annette Greiner

• Re: Working on FPWD, more to do (Thursday, 29 January)
• Re: BP 7, provide unique identifiers (Friday, 23 January)
• Re: BP 7, provide unique identifiers (Thursday, 22 January)
• BP 7, provide unique identifiers (Thursday, 22 January)
• notes on introductory material (Thursday, 22 January)
• Re: Excel??!! (Thursday, 22 January)
• Re: Excel??!! (Thursday, 22 January)
• Re: Excel??!! (Thursday, 22 January)
• Re: Best Practice 4 (Document Metadata) - I agree to suppress it (Wednesday, 21 January)
• Re: Best Practice 4 (Document Metadata) - I agree to suppress it (Tuesday, 20 January)
• Re: Best Practice 2 - Title and the use of the term format (Tuesday, 20 January)
• Re: dwbp-ISSUE-123 (Sensitive Data): Use of SHOULD versus MUST for Sensitive Data [Best practices document(s)] (Sunday, 18 January)
• Re: Data Access (Thursday, 15 January)
• Re: What time should we stop entering changes to BP document? (Thursday, 15 January)
• Re: Help on Data Versioning section (Thursday, 15 January)
• Re: dwbp-ISSUE-119 (BernadetteLoscio): Data Consumer x Data User [Best practices document(s)] (Wednesday, 14 January)
• Re: More BPs added (Wednesday, 14 January)
• Re: More BPs added (Wednesday, 14 January)
• Re: Call for comments on open questions about the audience for the DWBP doc (Wednesday, 7 January)
• Re: Call for comments on open questions about the audience for the DWBP doc (Wednesday, 7 January)
• Re: Call for comments on open questions about the audience for the DWBP doc (Wednesday, 7 January)

Antoine Isaac

• Re: Working on FPWD, more to do (Wednesday, 28 January)
• Re: Deferred to Linked Data Best Practices for vocab re-use (Tuesday, 27 January)
• Re: Deferred to Linked Data Best Practices for vocab re-use (Monday, 26 January)
• Re: comments on section 7.4 (Friday, 23 January)
• Re: comments on section 7.4 (Friday, 23 January)
• Re: comments on section 7.4 (Friday, 23 January)
• Re: on the relation between DWBP Best Practices Document and the Linked Data Best Practices Working Group Note of GLD (Friday, 23 January)
• Re: comments on section 7.4 (Friday, 23 January)
• Re: BP - BP14 reuse vocabularies (Thursday, 22 January)
• Re: BP - BP14 reuse vocabularies (Thursday, 22 January)
• Re: Formats, schemas, vocabularies, data models and section 7.4 of the Best Practices document (Thursday, 22 January)
• Re: My review of the DWBP 21st Jan editor's draft (Wednesday, 21 January)
• BP - use of RFC2119 (Wednesday, 21 January)
• BP - BP14 reuse vocabularies (Wednesday, 21 January)
• Re: Firefox does not like the BP doc (Friday, 16 January)
• Re: BP vocabulary section - update (Friday, 16 January)
• Re: dwbp-ISSUE-120 (BernadetteLoscio): BP Document metadata x BP Provide metadata in different formats x BP Document Vocabularies [Best practices document(s)] (Thursday, 15 January)
• Re: dwbp-ISSUE-120 (BernadetteLoscio): BP Document metadata x BP Provide metadata in different formats x BP Document Vocabularies [Best practices document(s)] (Thursday, 15 January)
• BP vocabulary section - update (Wednesday, 14 January)
• Re: dwbp-ISSUE-105 (MD or BP for MD): Metadata or Best Practices for Metadata? [Best practices document(s)] (Friday, 9 January)
• Re: BP vocabulary section (Friday, 9 January)
• BP vocabulary section - ontologies vs "controlled vocabularies" (Friday, 9 January)
• BP vocabulary section (Friday, 9 January)

Bernadette Farias Lóscio

• Re: Working on FPWD, more to do (Wednesday, 28 January)
• Re: A suggestion: Add status flags to BPs? (Friday, 23 January)
• Re: Comments on Best Practice document (Friday, 23 January)
• Re: A suggestion: Add status flags to BPs? (Friday, 23 January)
• Re: Excel??!! (Thursday, 22 January)
• Re: on the relation between DWBP Best Practices Document and the Linked Data Best Practices Working Group Note of GLD (Thursday, 22 January)
• Re: on the relation between DWBP Best Practices Document and the Linked Data Best Practices Working Group Note of GLD (Thursday, 22 January)
• About Best Practice: Use a trusted serialisation format for preserved data dumps (Thursday, 22 January)
• Re: Best Practice 4 (Document Metadata) - I agree to suppress it (Wednesday, 21 January)
• Re: Best Practice 4 (Document Metadata) - I agree to suppress it (Wednesday, 21 January)
• Re: Best Practice 4 (Document Metadata) - I agree to suppress it (Tuesday, 20 January)
• Re: Best Practice 4 (Document Metadata) - I agree to suppress it (Tuesday, 20 January)
• Re: Best Practice 2 - Title and the use of the term format (Tuesday, 20 January)
• Re: Sequencial numbering of BPs (Monday, 19 January)
• Re: Sequencial numbering of BPs (Monday, 19 January)
• Re: Sequencial numbering of BPs (Monday, 19 January)
• Call to review BP Document (Monday, 19 January)
• First Complete Draft of BP Document (Friday, 16 January)
• Re: BP vocabulary section - update (Friday, 16 January)
• Re: Data Access (Thursday, 15 January)
• Re: BP vocabulary section - update (Thursday, 15 January)
• Re: dwbp-ISSUE-120 (BernadetteLoscio): BP Document metadata x BP Provide metadata in different formats x BP Document Vocabularies [Best practices document(s)] (Thursday, 15 January)
• Re: BP: identification and granularity (Thursday, 15 January)
• Re: What time should we stop entering changes to BP document? (Thursday, 15 January)
• Re: What time should we stop entering changes to BP document? (Thursday, 15 January)
• Re: Data Access (Wednesday, 14 January)
• Help with Data Identification section (Wednesday, 14 January)
• Re: More BPs added (Wednesday, 14 January)
• Re: More BPs added (Wednesday, 14 January)
• Re: More BPs added (Wednesday, 14 January)
• Re: dwbp-ISSUE-119 (BernadetteLoscio): Data Consumer x Data User [Best practices document(s)] (Wednesday, 14 January)
• Re: More BPs added (Tuesday, 13 January)
• Re: Updated version of UCR document online (Monday, 12 January)
• Re: Draft BP Provenance intro section complete (Sunday, 11 January)
• Re: dwbp-ISSUE-116 (RiccardoAlbertoni): Best Practices for Data Quality - Insertion of specific strategies [Best practices document(s)] (Sunday, 11 January)
• Re: dwbp-ISSUE-117 (RiccardoAlbertoni): Should Data quality vocabulary be mentioned as specific strategy in BP Document? [Best practices document(s)] (Sunday, 11 January)
• Re: Updated version of UCR document online (Sunday, 11 January)
• Re: dwbp-ISSUE-105 (MD or BP for MD): Metadata or Best Practices for Metadata? [Best practices document(s)] (Friday, 9 January)
• COMURI and the BP document (Friday, 9 January)
• Call for Contributors (Thursday, 8 January)
• Re: Call for comments on open questions about the audience for the DWBP doc (Thursday, 8 January)
• Re: Call for comments on open questions about the audience for the DWBP doc (Wednesday, 7 January)

Carlos Iglesias

• Re: dwbp-ISSUE-144: There is a technological bias in several parts of the document [Best practices document(s)] (Friday, 30 January)
• Re: A suggestion: Add status flags to BPs? (Friday, 23 January)
• Re: comments on section 7.4 (Friday, 23 January)
• Re: A suggestion: Add status flags to BPs? (Friday, 23 January)
• Re: comments on section 7.4 (Friday, 23 January)
• Re: BP 7, provide unique identifiers (Friday, 23 January)
• Re: Comments on Best Practice document (Friday, 23 January)
• Re: Comments on Best Practice document (Thursday, 22 January)
• Re: [dwbp] Suggests additional content for BP1 implementation (#87) (Thursday, 22 January)
• Re: My review of the DWBP 21st Jan editor's draft (Thursday, 22 January)
• Re: Excel??!! (Thursday, 22 January)
• Re: [dwbp] Suggests additional content for BP1 implementation (#87) (Thursday, 22 January)
• Re: [dwbp] Suggests additional content for BP1 implementation (#87) (Thursday, 22 January)
• Re: My review of the DWBP 21st Jan editor's draft (Thursday, 22 January)
• Re: Best Practice 4 (Document Metadata) - I agree to suppress it (Thursday, 22 January)
• Re: BP - BP14 reuse vocabularies (Thursday, 22 January)
• Re: My review of the DWBP 21st Jan editor's draft (Wednesday, 21 January)
• Re: [dwbp] BP - URI structure is not relevant for REST (Wednesday, 21 January)
• Re: Best Practice 4 (Document Metadata) - I agree to suppress it (Wednesday, 21 January)
• My review of the DWBP 21st Jan editor's draft (Wednesday, 21 January)
• Re: Best Practice 4 (Document Metadata) - I agree to suppress it (Wednesday, 21 January)
• Re: Best Practice 4 (Document Metadata) - I agree to suppress it (Wednesday, 21 January)
• Re: Best Practice 4 (Document Metadata) - I agree to suppress it (Tuesday, 20 January)
• Re: Best Practice 2 - Title and the use of the term format (Tuesday, 20 January)

Caroline Burle

• Re: dwbp-ISSUE-144: There is a technological bias in several parts of the document [Best practices document(s)] (Monday, 26 January)
• Re: The document needs editing by a native English speaker (Thursday, 22 January)
• The document needs editing by a native English speaker (Thursday, 22 January)

Christophe Guéret

• Re: Agenda for Meeting - Future deliverable & milestone planning (Friday, 30 January)
• Re: My review of the DWBP 21st Jan editor's draft (Thursday, 22 January)
• Re: About Best Practice: Use a trusted serialisation format for preserved data dumps (Thursday, 22 January)
• Re: BP - use of RFC2119 (Thursday, 22 January)
• Re: Help on Data Versioning section (Friday, 16 January)
• Firefox does not like the BP doc (Friday, 16 January)
• Re: More BPs added (Wednesday, 14 January)
• Re: dwbp-ISSUE-119 (BernadetteLoscio): Data Consumer x Data User [Best practices document(s)] (Wednesday, 14 January)
• Re: More BPs added (Tuesday, 13 January)
• Re: COMURI and the BP document (Friday, 9 January)

Data on the Web Best Practices Working Group Issue Tracker

• dwbp-ISSUE-146 (TheNorm): Which section of a BP should be normative? [Best practices document(s)] (Friday, 30 January)
• dwbp-ISSUE-145 (Caroline Burle): Define an actionable best practice for the BP7 [Best practices document(s)] (Monday, 26 January)
• dwbp-ISSUE-144: There is a technological bias in several parts of the document [Best practices document(s)] (Sunday, 25 January)
• dwbp-ISSUE-143: Data Preservation BP should be reviewed [Best practices document(s)] (Sunday, 25 January)
• dwbp-ACTION-136: Create a wiki page to begin a glossary of terminology (Friday, 23 January)
• dwbp-ISSUE-142: About multilingualism [Best practices document(s)] (Thursday, 22 January)
• dwbp-ISSUE-141: title and subtitle are normative ? [Best practices document(s)] (Thursday, 22 January)
• dwbp-ISSUE-140: Should we include the data lifecycle in the best practices document? [Best practices document(s)] (Thursday, 22 January)
• dwbp-ISSUE-139 (BernadetteLoscio): Suggests additional content for BP1 implementation [Best practices document(s)] (Thursday, 22 January)
• dwbp-ISSUE-138 (BernadetteLoscio): Should we split Use machine-readable standardized data formats BP in two? [Best practices document(s)] (Thursday, 22 January)
• dwbp-ISSUE-137 (BernadetteLoscio): Review BP Preserve person's right to privacy [Best practices document(s)] (Thursday, 22 January)
• dwbp-ISSUE-136 (BernadetteLoscio): Proposal for Metadata BP (Thursday, 22 January)
• dwbp-ISSUE-135 (BernadetteLoscio): Use of RFC2119 [Best practices document(s)] (Thursday, 22 January)
• dwbp-ISSUE-134 (BernadetteLoscio): About Formats, schemas, vocabularies and data models [Best practices document(s)] (Thursday, 22 January)
• dwbp-ISSUE-133 (Standard metadata): SHOULD or MUST metadata be provided using standard terms [Best practices document(s)] (Thursday, 22 January)
• dwbp-ISSUE-132 (BernadetteLoscio): Review Document Metadata BP [Best practices document(s)] (Saturday, 17 January)
• dwbp-ISSUE-131 (BernadetteLoscio): Follow REST principles when designing APIs BP is incomplete. [Best practices document(s)] (Saturday, 17 January)
• dwbp-ISSUE-130 (BernadetteLoscio): Reuse vocabularies BP is incomplete [Best practices document(s)] (Saturday, 17 January)
• dwbp-ISSUE-129 (BernadetteLoscio): Review specialization hierarchies between BP [Best practices document(s)] (Saturday, 17 January)
• dwbp-ISSUE-128: To discuss about BP specialization [Best practices document(s)] (Friday, 16 January)
• dwbp-ISSUE-127 (BernadetteLoscio): Discuss the use of SchemaVer on the Implementation of the Provide Versioning Information BP [Best practices document(s)] (Thursday, 15 January)
• dwbp-ISSUE-126 (BernadetteLoscio): Review the specialization hierarchy between Provide Metadata BP and other BP [Best practices document(s)] (Thursday, 15 January)
• dwbp-ISSUE-125 (BernadetteLoscio): Discuss the relation between DWBP and Best Practices for Publishing Linked Data [Best practices document(s)] (Thursday, 15 January)
• dwbp-ISSUE-124 (BernadetteLoscio): Overlap between Best Practices for Publishing Linked Data and DWBP [Best practices document(s)] (Thursday, 15 January)
• dwbp-ISSUE-123 (Sensitive Data): Use of SHOULD versus MUST for Sensitive Data [Best practices document(s)] (Thursday, 15 January)
• dwbp-ISSUE-122 (BernadetteLoscio): Review Provide Metadata Standardized BP [Best practices document(s)] (Thursday, 15 January)
• dwbp-ISSUE-121 (BernadetteLoscio): Requirements for human readable metadata [Best practices document(s)] (Thursday, 15 January)
• dwbp-ISSUE-120 (BernadetteLoscio): BP Document metadata x BP Provide metadata in different formats x BP Document Vocabularies [Best practices document(s)] (Wednesday, 14 January)
• dwbp-ISSUE-119 (BernadetteLoscio): Data Consumer x Data User [Best practices document(s)] (Tuesday, 13 January)
• dwbp-ISSUE-118: New Requirement suggestion R-VersionURIDesign [Use Cases & Requirements Document] (Sunday, 11 January)
• dwbp-ISSUE-117 (RiccardoAlbertoni): Should Data quality vocabulary be mentioned as specific strategy in BP Document? [Best practices document(s)] (Saturday, 10 January)
• dwbp-ISSUE-116 (RiccardoAlbertoni): Best Practices for Data Quality - Insertion of specific strategies [Best practices document(s)] (Saturday, 10 January)
• dwbp-ISSUE-115 (Share-PSI): Can we align Share-PSI and DWBP templates? [Best practices document(s)] (Friday, 9 January)
• dwbp-ISSUE-114 (Feedback): Feedback required? [Best practices document(s)] (Friday, 9 January)
• dwbp-ISSUE-113 (Versioning): No req for versioning? [Best practices document(s)] (Friday, 9 January)
• dwbp-ISSUE-112 (R-AccessUptodate): R-AccessUptodate for data Access? [Best practices document(s)] (Friday, 9 January)
• dwbp-ISSUE-111 (Def: Granularity): What is data Granularity? [Best practices document(s)] (Friday, 9 January)
• dwbp-ISSUE-110 (DQV in BP?): Data Quality vocab reqs in BP Doc? [Best practices document(s)] (Friday, 9 January)
• dwbp-ISSUE-109 (machine Readable Licence?): No UCR for machine readable licences [Best practices document(s)] (Friday, 9 January)
• dwbp-ISSUE-108 (R-FormatLocalize): Where does R-FormatLocalize go? [Best practices document(s)] (Friday, 9 January)
• dwbp-ISSUE-107 (Similar Reqs): R-MultipleRepresentations and R-FormatMultiple [Best practices document(s)] (Friday, 9 January)
• dwbp-ISSUE-106 (Req Meaning): Meaning of R-MetadataStandardized & R-MetadataDocument [Best practices document(s)] (Friday, 9 January)
• dwbp-ISSUE-105 (MD or BP for MD): Metadata or Best Practices for Metadata? [Best practices document(s)] (Friday, 9 January)
• dwbp-ISSUE-104 (Evidence of Relevance): Can we say that the evidence section shows the relevance of the BP? [Best practices document(s)] (Friday, 9 January)
• dwbp-ISSUE-103 (User types): Should we talk about the diff types of user [Best practices document(s)] (Friday, 9 January)
• dwbp-ISSUE-102 (UC-BP link): Uuse Cases-BP links [Best practices document(s)] (Friday, 9 January)
• dwbp-ISSUE-101 (Challenges table): Should we use a table to present the challenges? [Best practices document(s)] (Friday, 9 January)
• dwbp-ISSUE-100 (BPs and Lifecyle): organising BPs around Life Cycle [Best practices document(s)] (Friday, 9 January)

Eric

• Re: Agenda for Meeting - Future deliverable & milestone planning (Friday, 30 January)
• Re: dwbp-ISSUE-123 (Sensitive Data): Use of SHOULD versus MUST for Sensitive Data [Best practices document(s)] (Saturday, 17 January)

Eric Kauz

• RE: Best Practice 2 - Title and the use of the term format (Monday, 19 January)
• RE: BP vocabulary section - update (Friday, 16 January)
• RE: dwbp-ISSUE-119 (BernadetteLoscio): Data Consumer x Data User [Best practices document(s)] (Wednesday, 14 January)
• RE: BP vocabulary section (Monday, 12 January)
• RE: BP vocabulary section (Friday, 9 January)

Eric Stephan

• Re: Clarifying timing etc. (Saturday, 31 January)
• Re: Working on FPWD, more to do (Wednesday, 28 January)
• Re: dwbp-ISSUE-137 (BernadetteLoscio): Review BP Preserve person's right to privacy [Best practices document(s)] (Friday, 23 January)
• Re: A suggestion: Add status flags to BPs? (Friday, 23 January)
• Re: A suggestion: Add status flags to BPs? (Friday, 23 January)
• Re: First Complete Draft of BP Document (Friday, 16 January)
• Re: What time should we stop entering changes to BP document? (Thursday, 15 January)
• What time should we stop entering changes to BP document? (Thursday, 15 January)
• Re: dwbp-ISSUE-119 (BernadetteLoscio): Data Consumer x Data User [Best practices document(s)] (Wednesday, 14 January)
• Data Sensitivity BP and first draft... (Tuesday, 13 January)
• Re: Draft BP Provenance intro section complete (Saturday, 10 January)
• Draft BP Provenance intro section complete (Saturday, 10 January)
• Re: Call for comments on open questions about the audience for the DWBP doc (Wednesday, 7 January)
• Re: Call for comments on open questions about the audience for the DWBP doc (Wednesday, 7 January)

Ghislain Atemezing

• Re: A suggestion: Add status flags to BPs? (Friday, 23 January)
• Re: Minor updates to UCR (Thursday, 22 January)
• Re: BP - BP14 reuse vocabularies (Thursday, 22 January)
• Re: dwbp-ISSUE-119 (BernadetteLoscio): Data Consumer x Data User [Best practices document(s)] (Wednesday, 14 January)

Hadley Beeman

• Agenda for tomorrow's call — and an extra call next week for the BP doc (Thursday, 15 January)

Ig Ibert Bittencourt

• Re: comments on section 7.4 (Thursday, 22 January)

Ingo Simonis

• Re: Call for comments on open questions about the audience for the DWBP doc (Thursday, 8 January)

Joao Paulo Almeida

• Re: on the relation between DWBP Best Practices Document and the Linked Data Best Practices Working Group Note of GLD (Friday, 23 January)
• Re: comments on section 7.4 (Friday, 23 January)
• Formats, schemas, vocabularies, data models and section 7.4 of the Best Practices document (Thursday, 22 January)
• Re: Best Practice 4 (Document Metadata) - I agree to suppress it (Tuesday, 20 January)

João Paulo Almeida

• Re: on the relation between DWBP Best Practices Document and the Linked Data Best Practices Working Group Note of GLD (Thursday, 22 January)
• comments on section 7.4 (Thursday, 22 January)
• on the relation between DWBP Best Practices Document and the Linked Data Best Practices Working Group Note of GLD (Tuesday, 20 January)

Laufer

• Re: Agenda for Meeting - Future deliverable & milestone planning (Friday, 30 January)
• Re: A suggestion: Add status flags to BPs? (Friday, 23 January)
• Re: dwbp-ISSUE-133 (Standard metadata): SHOULD or MUST metadata be provided using standard terms [Best practices document(s)] (Thursday, 22 January)
• Re: Formats, schemas, vocabularies, data models and section 7.4 of the Best Practices document (Thursday, 22 January)
• Re: Best Practice 4 (Document Metadata) - I agree to suppress it (Wednesday, 21 January)
• Re: Best Practice 4 (Document Metadata) - I agree to suppress it (Tuesday, 20 January)
• Re: Sequencial numbering of BPs (Monday, 19 January)
• Best Practice 4 (Document Metadata) - I agree to suppress it (Monday, 19 January)
• Re: Sequencial numbering of BPs (Monday, 19 January)
• Sequencial numbering of BPs (Monday, 19 January)
• Best Practice 2 - Title and the use of the term format (Monday, 19 January)
• Re: First Complete Draft of BP Document (Friday, 16 January)
• Re: Best Practice 1: Provide metadata (Wednesday, 14 January)
• Re: Best Practice 1: Provide metadata (Wednesday, 14 January)
• Re: dwbp-ISSUE-119 (BernadetteLoscio): Data Consumer x Data User [Best practices document(s)] (Wednesday, 14 January)
• Best Practice 1: Provide metadata (Wednesday, 14 January)
• Re: Call for comments on open questions about the audience for the DWBP doc (Wednesday, 7 January)

Lee, Deirdre

• Agenda for Meeting - Future deliverable & milestone planning (Thursday, 29 January)
• RE: Minor updates to UCR (Thursday, 22 January)
• RE: dwbp-ACTION-114: Complete use case and requirements for data enrichment. related to issue-72 (Thursday, 22 January)
• RE: Minor updates to UCR (Thursday, 22 January)
• Agenda for Meeting - Voting on PWD of UCR and BP docs (Thursday, 22 January)
• RE: dwbp-ISSUE-96 (Share-PSI): Is the WG happy with the Share-PSI use case [Use Cases & Requirements Document] (Sunday, 11 January)
• RE: dwbp-ISSUE-118: New Requirement suggestion R-VersionURIDesign [Use Cases & Requirements Document] (Sunday, 11 January)
• RE: dwbp-ACTION-114: Complete use case and requirements for data enrichment. related to issue-72 (Sunday, 11 January)
• RE: Updated version of UCR document online (Sunday, 11 January)
• Updated version of UCR document online (Sunday, 11 January)
• RE: dwbp-ISSUE-92 (Dropping Formats): OK to drop last word of 'Requirements for Data Formats' from challenges/req list? [Use Cases & Requirements Document] (Sunday, 11 January)
• RE: dwbp-ISSUE-95 (MSI): Requirements derived from MSI use case [Use Cases & Requirements Document] (Sunday, 11 January)
• RE: dwbp-ISSUE-83 (LuSTRE): New Reqs from LuSTRE Use Case [Use Cases & Requirements Document] (Sunday, 11 January)
• RE: dwbp-ISSUE-89 (R-SoftwareDataUsage): New req: Data should be annotated with descriptions of software applications using the data [Use Cases & Requirements Document] (Sunday, 11 January)
• RE: dwbp-ISSUE-90 (R-UsageFeedback): new req: Data consumers should have a way of sharing feedback and rating data [Use Cases & Requirements Document] (Sunday, 11 January)
• RE: dwbp-ISSUE-98 (R-QualityOpinions): R-QualityOpinions and R-IncorporateFeedback seem to be duplicates? [Use Cases & Requirements Document] (Sunday, 11 January)
• RE: dwbp-ISSUE-88 (R-DesignatedThingsServiceProviders): New req: Data produced by things or services should be associated with complete things/services metadata descriptions. [Use Cases & Requirements Document] (Sunday, 11 January)
• RE: dwbp-ISSUE-91 (R-Location): New req: Locations (countries, regions, cities etc.) must be referred to consistently [Use Cases & Requirements Document] (Sunday, 11 January)
• RE: dwbp-ISSUE-87 (R-DesignatedUserExpertise): New req: Data should be designated if either by virtue of its complexity or its nature is relevant to users with specific expertise. [Use Cases & Requirements Document] (Sunday, 11 January)
• RE: dwbp-ISSUE-97 (Axoims in UCR): Should we include the three axioms in the UCR [Use Cases & Requirements Document] (Saturday, 10 January)
• Agenda for tomorrow's telco (Thursday, 8 January)

Makx Dekkers

• RE: BP 7, provide unique identifiers (Friday, 23 January)
• RE: Comments on Best Practice document (Friday, 23 January)
• RE: Comments on Best Practice document (Friday, 23 January)
• RE: BP 7, provide unique identifiers (Friday, 23 January)
• On multilingualism (Thursday, 22 January)
• RE: [dwbp] Suggests additional content for BP1 implementation (#87) (Thursday, 22 January)
• Best Practice 20: Preserve person's right to privacy (Thursday, 22 January)
• RE: [dwbp] Suggests additional content for BP1 implementation (#87) (Thursday, 22 January)
• Comments on Best Practice document (Thursday, 22 January)
• RE: dwbp-ISSUE-135 (BernadetteLoscio): Use of RFC2119 [Best practices document(s)] (Thursday, 22 January)
• Re: dwbp-ISSUE-119 (BernadetteLoscio): Data Consumer x Data User [Best practices document(s)] (Tuesday, 13 January)
• RE: dwbp-ISSUE-103 (User types): Should we talk about the diff types of user [Best practices document(s)] (Saturday, 10 January)
• RE: Call for comments on open questions about the audience for the DWBP doc (Wednesday, 7 January)

Manuel.CARRASCO-BENITEZ@ec.europa.eu

• RE: Best Practice 2 - Title and the use of the term format (Tuesday, 20 January)
• BP: identification and granularity (Thursday, 15 January)
• RE: COMURI (Friday, 9 January)
• COMURI (Wednesday, 7 January)

Mcgibbney, Lewis J (398M)

• Apologies (Friday, 16 January)

Nathalia Sautchuk Patrício

• Re: Agenda for tomorrow's telco (Thursday, 8 January)

Newton Calegari

• Re: OK to freeze the BP doc please? (Monday, 26 January)
• Re: [dwbp] BP - URI structure is not relevant for REST (Thursday, 22 January)
• [dwbp] BP - URI structure is not relevant for REST (Wednesday, 21 January)
• Re: dwbp-ISSUE-127 (BernadetteLoscio): Discuss the use of SchemaVer on the Implementation of the Provide Versioning Information BP [Best practices document(s)] (Friday, 16 January)
• [dwbp] Contributing on Github (Friday, 9 January)

Phil Archer

• Clarifying timing etc. (Friday, 30 January)
• Re: Working on FPWD, more to do (Friday, 30 January)
• Status BP Friday 30 Jan (Friday, 30 January)
• Re: Working on FPWD, more to do (Thursday, 29 January)
• Re: Working on FPWD, more to do (Wednesday, 28 January)
• Re: Working on FPWD, more to do (Wednesday, 28 January)
• Working on FPWD, more to do (Tuesday, 27 January)
• Re: Deferred to Linked Data Best Practices for vocab re-use (Tuesday, 27 January)
• April Face to Face - who's coming? (Tuesday, 27 January)
• Deferred to Linked Data Best Practices for vocab re-use (Monday, 26 January)
• OK to freeze the BP doc please? (Monday, 26 January)
• Short URI request (Friday, 23 January)
• A suggestion: Add status flags to BPs? (Friday, 23 January)
• Re: [dwbp] Suggests additional content for BP1 implementation (#87) (Thursday, 22 January)
• Re: [dwbp] Suggests additional content for BP1 implementation (#87) (Thursday, 22 January)
• Issues disabled on GitHub (Thursday, 22 January)
• Re: [dwbp] Suggests additional content for BP1 implementation (#87) (Thursday, 22 January)
• Re: My review of the DWBP 21st Jan editor's draft (Thursday, 22 January)
• Re: Minor updates to UCR (Thursday, 22 January)
• Code lists Issue-48 (Thursday, 22 January)
• Excel??!! (Thursday, 22 January)
• Re: Sequencial numbering of BPs (Monday, 19 January)
• Minor updates to UCR (Monday, 19 January)
• Re: Best Practice 1: Provide metadata (Wednesday, 14 January)
• Re: Best Practice 1: Provide metadata (Wednesday, 14 January)
• Re: More BPs added (Tuesday, 13 January)
• More BPs added (Tuesday, 13 January)
• Writing BPs, ISSUE-106 (Monday, 12 January)
• Re: dwbp-ISSUE-105 (MD or BP for MD): Metadata or Best Practices for Metadata? [Best practices document(s)] (Friday, 9 January)
• Re: Call for comments on open questions about the audience for the DWBP doc (Thursday, 8 January)
• Re: Call for comments on open questions about the audience for the DWBP doc (Wednesday, 7 January)

Riccardo Albertoni

• Re: dwbp-ISSUE-109 (machine Readable Licence?): No UCR for machine readable licences [Best practices document(s)] (Wednesday, 14 January)

Steven Adler

• RE: Call for comments on open questions about the audience for the DWBP doc (Thursday, 8 January)
• RE: Lifecycle "Big picture"--quick and dirty draft (Thursday, 8 January)
• Re: Call for comments on open questions about the audience for the DWBP doc (Thursday, 8 January)
• Re: AusGOAL Qualities of Open Data (Thursday, 8 January)
• RE: audience for the BP doc (Thursday, 8 January)
• Re: COMURI (Thursday, 8 January)

Yaso

• Re: Call for comments on open questions about the audience for the DWBP doc (Wednesday, 7 January)

yaso@nic.br

• The BP Document (Friday, 23 January)
• Re: [dwbp] BP - URI structure is not relevant for REST (Thursday, 22 January)
• Re: What time should we stop entering changes to BP document? (Thursday, 15 January)
• Re: What time should we stop entering changes to BP document? (Thursday, 15 January)
• Re: Data Access (Thursday, 15 January)
• Data Access (Wednesday, 14 January)
• Re: dwbp-ISSUE-119 (BernadetteLoscio): Data Consumer x Data User [Best practices document(s)] (Wednesday, 14 January)

Last message date: Saturday, 31 January 2015 17:36:13 UTC