W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-dwbp-wg@w3.org > January 2015

Re: dwbp-ISSUE-105 (MD or BP for MD): Metadata or Best Practices for Metadata? [Best practices document(s)]

From: Bernadette Farias Lóscio <bfl@cin.ufpe.br>
Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2015 16:12:28 -0300
Message-ID: <CANx1Pzy1L40E=yF7AFA=wotEP8NbdctWPTZHqXdmbyPZ9qM5Xg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Phil Archer <phila@w3.org>
Cc: Antoine Isaac <aisaac@few.vu.nl>, "public-dwbp-wg@w3.org" <public-dwbp-wg@w3.org>
Hi Phil,

I agree with you! The issue was just for metadata, but my intention was to
apply to the other sections.

Thanks!
Bernadette

2015-01-09 16:07 GMT-03:00 Phil Archer <phila@w3.org>:

> I'm looking at the doc now and see that every section is called "Best
> Practices for {topic}" where {topic} is Metadata, Data Identification, Data
> Formats etc.
>
> So this Issue should apply to all sections. Personally I'd always opt for
> the minimum viable description so, given the title of the doc and the level
> 1 chapter (The Best Practices), I'm editing the sub headings to just say
> {topic}.
>
> If there are objections it's a trivial matter to put them back of course.
>
> Phil.
>
> Trackbot, close Issue-105
>
>
> On 09/01/2015 16:52, Antoine Isaac wrote:
>
>> I would say "Metadata"
>>
>> Antoine
>>
>> On 1/9/15 2:40 PM, Data on the Web Best Practices Working Group Issue
>> Tracker wrote:
>>
>>> dwbp-ISSUE-105 (MD or BP for MD): Metadata or Best Practices for
>>> Metadata? [Best practices document(s)]
>>>
>>> http://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/track/issues/105
>>>
>>> Raised by: Bernadette Farias Loscio
>>> On product: Best practices document(s)
>>>
>>>   Should we use "Best Practices for Metadata" or just "Metadata"?
>>> (section 7.1)
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
> --
>
>
> Phil Archer
> W3C Data Activity Lead
> http://www.w3.org/2013/data/
>
> http://philarcher.org
> +44 (0)7887 767755
> @philarcher1
>
>


-- 
Bernadette Farias Lóscio
Centro de Informática
Universidade Federal de Pernambuco - UFPE, Brazil
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Received on Friday, 9 January 2015 19:13:15 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Friday, 9 January 2015 19:13:16 UTC