- From: Lee, Deirdre <Deirdre.Lee@deri.org>
- Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2015 17:31:41 +0000
- To: Bernadette Farias Lóscio <bfl@cin.ufpe.br>
- CC: Data on the Web Best Practices Working Group <public-dwbp-wg@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <DA0D3B2CE5F5614AA2307A974AFAC39B01552E6A98@UDSMBX02.uds.nuigalway.ie>
Hi Bernadette, Thanks for feedback, I’ve made the following updates: - created a new challenge called "Data Versioning" and associate the R-DataVersion requirement to this new challenge. - renamed the challenge "Requirements for Persistence" to "Requirements for Preservation". - create a new challenge called "Feedback" and associate the R-UsageFeedback requirement to this new challenge. - removed the challenge "Industry Reuse" and include the requirement R-SLAAvailable in the Metadata section. I’ve left Data Selection Challenge in, because I’m not sure where to relocate ‘R-DataIrreproducibility, R-DataLifecyclePrivacy, R-DataLifecycleStage’ to (I suggest removing R-DesignatedUserExpertise as it is covered by R-UsageFeedback and R-TrackDataUsage). Will take guidance from BP structure on these reqs (maybe can leave for couple of weeks). Similar with separate reqs for bp vs. the vocabs. How about for now we leave it, and see how much BP doc addresses and how much is left to vocabs, and then review structure of UCR if necessary after? Cheers, Deirdre From: Bernadette Farias Lóscio [mailto:bfl@cin.ufpe.br] Sent: 11 January 2015 15:25 To: Lee, Deirdre Cc: Data on the Web Best Practices Working Group Subject: Re: Updated version of UCR document online Hi Deirde, Thanks for the updates! I took a look in the current version of the UCR document and I found the following inconsistencies between the BP document and the UCR doc. I also propose some solutions to solve them. 1. In the BP document there are 03 challenges that are not listed in the UCR doc: Data Versioning, Data Preservation and Feedback. To solve this, I suggest to: - create a new challenge called "Data Versioning" and associate the R-DataVersion requirement to this new challenge. - rename the challenge "Requirements for Persistence" to "Requirements for Preservation". - create a new challenge called "Feedback" and associate the R-UsageFeedback requirement to this new challenge. 2. Data Selection and Industry reuse were not considered in the BPD - During the last F2F, Data Selection was considered to be out of the scope of the BP document. I suggest to remove the Challenge Data Selection and to relocate the following requirements: R-DataIrreproducibility, R-DataLifecyclePrivacy, R-DataLifecycleStage and R-DesignatedUserExpertise. - Since SLA is a type of metadata (similar to Geographic Context), I suggest to remove the challenge "Industry Reuse" and include the requirement R-SLAAvailable in the Metadata section. 3. I understand that requirements from Section 4.2 and 4.3 are requirements for the vocabularies instead of vocabularies for BP. I think that this should be more clear in the UC document. I suggest to: - separate requirements for BP from requirements for Vocabularies in Section 3.2. - include a new requirement for Data Quality, like "Data Quality information should be available". This requirement can be easily covered by a BP. Please, let me know if you have other comments or suggestions. cheers, Bernadette 2015-01-11 0:26 GMT-03:00 Lee, Deirdre <Deirdre.Lee@deri.org<mailto:Deirdre.Lee@deri.org>>: Hi, The latest version of the UCR document is now online: http://w3c.github.io/dwbp/usecasesv1.html This includes all of the feedback from the use-case authors. As you can see, there are a lot more linkages now between use-cases and requirements. This helped reemphasise some existing requirements, identify those that are out of scope, merge a couple, and identify a couple of new requirements not yet included. I have also addressed the open issues. If you’re interested, I’ve also uploaded the UCR.ttl file https://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/wiki/Use-Cases_Requirements_RDF Hopefully this will be useful for contributors to the BP document. Cheers, Deirdre ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Deirdre Lee Research Associate eGovernment Domain (DEG) Insight-NUIG IDA BusinessPark, Lower Dangan, Galway, Ireland deirdre.lee@deri.org<mailto:deirdre.lee@deri.org> skype: deirdrelee twitter: @deirdrelee linkedin: ie.linkedin.com/in/leedeirdre/<http://ie.linkedin.com/in/leedeirdre/> ----------------------------------------------------------------------- -- Bernadette Farias Lóscio Centro de Informática Universidade Federal de Pernambuco - UFPE, Brazil ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Received on Sunday, 11 January 2015 17:32:13 UTC