- From: Bernadette Farias Lóscio <bfl@cin.ufpe.br>
- Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2015 14:25:25 -0300
- To: Phil Archer <phila@w3.org>
- Cc: Laufer <laufer@globo.com>, DWBP WG <public-dwbp-wg@w3.org>
yes Phil! Each BP has an id, which is used to make references to specific BP in the document. cheers, Bernadette 2015-01-19 11:53 GMT-03:00 Phil Archer <phila@w3.org>: > The numbers are auto-generated and not stable for the reasons Laufer says. > Each BP has an id (at least, it should have!) and this gives it a frag id > that all cross references should use. > > If in doubt, go to the generated list, click on a BP and find it's > fragment id in the addrrss bar. > > HTH > > Phil > > > >> I agree that BPS are mainly identified by their titles, so why we have a >> number? It may confuse things and we can't avoid people using the number >> as >> id. And during the unstable phase we will have different references using >> the same id. Well, maybe it is too much care. >> >> 2015-01-19 12:04 GMT-02:00 Bernadette Farias Lóscio <bfl@cin.ufpe.br>: >> >>> BP are mainly identified by their titles, for example "Provide Metadat >>> BP", i.e., In the document, we don't make a reference to a BP using >>> its number. In the case an extension, I suppose that the numbering of >>> the current version will be stable and a new numbering may be used, >>> no? >>> >>> >>> >>> 2015-01-19 10:58 GMT-03:00 Laufer <laufer@globo.com>: >>> > But if a BP makes a reference to another one? >>> > >>> > And if we extend the document with another version? >>> > >>> > Laufer >>> > >>> > 2015-01-19 11:55 GMT-02:00 Bernadette Farias Lóscio >>> <bfl@cin.ufpe.br>: >>> >> >>> >> Hi Laufer, >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> The number is generated automatically :) In this case, I think it >>> >> won't be a problem to use numbers. >>> >> >>> >> thanks! >>> >> Bernadette >>> >> >>> >> 2015-01-19 10:51 GMT-03:00 Laufer <laufer@globo.com>: >>> >> > Hi all, >>> >> > >>> >> > I am reviewing the issue of suppressing the BP4 (because we have an >>> >> > entire >>> >> > session about BP for data vocabularies) and if I agree in >>> suppressing >>> it >>> >> > we >>> >> > will have no renumber all the BPs. >>> >> > >>> >> > Is the sequential numbering an ideal way of identifying the BPs? >>> >> > >>> >> > Best, >>> >> > Laufer >>> >> > >>> >> > -- >>> >> > . . . .. . . >>> >> > . . . .. >>> >> > . .. . >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> -- >>> >> Bernadette Farias Lóscio >>> >> Centro de Informática >>> >> Universidade Federal de Pernambuco - UFPE, Brazil >>> >> >>> >> >>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > -- >>> > . . . .. . . >>> > . . . .. >>> > . .. . >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Bernadette Farias Lóscio >>> Centro de Informática >>> Universidade Federal de Pernambuco - UFPE, Brazil >>> >>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> . . . .. . . >> . . . .. >> . .. . >> > > > -- > > Sent from my phone. Please excuse typos. -- Bernadette Farias Lóscio Centro de Informática Universidade Federal de Pernambuco - UFPE, Brazil ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Received on Monday, 19 January 2015 17:26:15 UTC