- From: Carlos Iglesias <carlos.iglesias.moro@gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2015 10:21:40 +0100
- To: Makx Dekkers <mail@makxdekkers.com>
- Cc: Annette Greiner <amgreiner@lbl.gov>, Public DWBP WG <public-dwbp-wg@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAAa1Xz=DAKrjBOqE_DAKN40cfc-M+10PgDJsLRhDTOxgw3VJ=Q@mail.gmail.com>
> > > I would propose the by-line to read: > > "Data MUST be associated with a unique identifier" > Great, a BP title without the word "URI" in it would be the ideal (although that's will be the only implementation option later). In the Why section there could then be a short discussion about the > granularity of the identification, e.g. not just datasets as a whole, > but also parts of datasets as far as these parts are likely to be > interesting by themselves for direct access and re-use. > Agree, provided that the discourse will be in the line of "the more granularity the best", not "you must have the biggest granularity level" > There is also a bit of duplication in the text: the Why section starts > with the same sentence as the approach section. This text should be only > in the approach section because it is about how it's done not why. > > Makx. > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Annette Greiner [mailto:amgreiner@lbl.gov] > > Sent: Thursday, January 22, 2015 11:12 PM > > To: Public DWBP WG > > Subject: BP 7, provide unique identifiers > > > > Looking at BP 7, I don't understand the idea. I'm wondering what we > > are defining as a "data resource". From the text, it seems we are > > using it in the sense of whatever is linked to. That seems fair, > > because datasets can be available as a single file or several files or > > by separate API requests for very specific queries, etc. So, if a > > data resource is a data element that is linked to, then it is > > represented by a URL. The discussion of URNs is clearly out of scope > > for us, as they are not on the web. That leaves URLs, but then the > > best practice comes down to ensuring a unique URL for whatever has a > > URL. I think it would be impossible to not do that an still put > > something on the web. In the context of data on the web, I don't think > > much of this best practice is in scope, and the bit that is in scope > > is tautological. > > -Annette > > > > -- > > Annette Greiner > > NERSC Data and Analytics Services > > Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory > > 510-495-2935 > > > > -- --- Carlos Iglesias. Internet & Web Consultant. +34 687 917 759 contact@carlosiglesias.es @carlosiglesias http://es.linkedin.com/in/carlosiglesiasmoro/en
Received on Friday, 23 January 2015 09:22:08 UTC