- From: Joao Paulo Almeida <jpalmeida@ieee.org>
- Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2015 16:36:10 -0200
- To: Laufer <laufer@globo.com>
- Cc: Bernadette Farias Lóscio <bfl@cin.ufpe.br>, DWBP WG <public-dwbp-wg@w3.org>
Dear Laufer, Bernadette and all, I agree with Laufer's conclusion, and support the decision to remove BP4. best regards, João Paulo On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 12:27 PM, Laufer <laufer@globo.com> wrote: > Hi, Bernadette, > > DBpedia documents a lot of things like applications, use cases, different > ways of accessing data using sparql, credits, etc. But it is a documentation > for humans. > > What I think is that a vocabulary as DCAT should be the responsible of > pointing to these artifacts and the metadata related to them. > > So when in BP1 we say to use DCAT, I think we are saying: "document what > metadata is being provided". If each of the artifacts has a vocabulary, so > the vocabulary documentation is responsible for documenting the metadata. > > BP2 asserts to provide metadata for humans. I think that this includes the > documentation for humans. What is to provide metadata for humans if you > don't document it? > > For me, BP4 can be derived from BP1 + BP2 + BP3. > > Cheers, > Laufer > > > > 2015-01-20 11:16 GMT-02:00 Bernadette Farias Lóscio <bfl@cin.ufpe.br>: > >> Hi Laufer, >> >> Thanks for your message! My comments are inline. >> > >> > The BP3 >> > >> > "Use standard terms to describe metadata - Metadata should be provided >> > using >> > standard vocabularies for greater interoperability and discoverability." >> > >> > already suggest that a user should use vocabularies. >> >> yes! I agree! >> >> > >> > BP1 (provide metadata) talks about the catalogs and I think that the >> > documentation about what metadata is provided should be in these >> > catalogs. >> >> I think that the Provide Metadata BP is more general and later on it >> will be specialized by other BP. >> >> > >> > So, I think that BP1 and BP3 cover BP4. I do not know if the intention >> > of >> > BP4 was to call attention to code lists, but I think that if this would >> > be >> > necessary, this info can be in section 7.4. >> >> The Document metadata BP should be rewritten to become more general, >> i.e., not just vocabularies should be documented. In this case, what >> else should be documented when talking about metadata? >> >> cheers, >> Bernadette >> >> > >> > Best, >> > Laufer >> > >> > PS - again about sequential numbering as id - I do not like referring to >> > BPs >> > in these way. If we suppress BP4, this won't be true because we will >> > have >> > another BP4. >> > >> > >> > >> > -- >> > . . . .. . . >> > . . . .. >> > . .. . >> >> >> >> -- >> Bernadette Farias Lóscio >> Centro de Informática >> Universidade Federal de Pernambuco - UFPE, Brazil >> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > > -- > . . . .. . . > . . . .. > . .. .
Received on Tuesday, 20 January 2015 18:36:37 UTC