RE: BP vocabulary section

Hi Antoine,

I am available to review this section.

Best Regards

Eric

-----Original Message-----
From: Antoine Isaac [mailto:aisaac@few.vu.nl] 
Sent: Friday, January 09, 2015 10:12 AM
To: Public DWBP WG; Ig Ibert Bittencourt; Ghislain Atemezing; Mark Harrison; Eric Kauz
Subject: BP vocabulary section

Dear Ig, Eric, Ghislain, (cc Mark in case he can jump in)

It seems the call today made me a de facto coordinator for this section...

The four of us are now listed as contributors https://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/wiki/Call_for_BP_Contributors

Bernadette says that this section needs reviewing, and filling in best practices. I just had a brief look; enough to understand she's right.

My questions are:
- are you ready to review this section and provide suggestions for changes, if needed? and/or
- are you ready to contribute to the best practices?

This needs to happen before next Tuesday.

In the meantime, a question for Ig: is the current text at http://w3c.github.io/dwbp/bp.html#dataVocabularies
resulting from only your work, possibly incorporating the outcome of the discussion we had back in December?
Or have others contributed, in which case we should include them in the discussion?

Thanks for the input,

Antoine

CONFIDENTIALITY / DISCLAIMER: The contents of this e-mail are  confidential and are not to be regarded as a contractual offer or acceptance from GS1 (registered in Belgium). 
If you are not the addressee, or if this has been copied or sent to you in error, you must not use data herein for any purpose, you must delete it, and should inform the sender. 
GS1 disclaims liability for accuracy or completeness, and opinions expressed are those of the author alone. 
GS1 may monitor communications. 
Third party rights acknowledged. 
(c) 2012.
</a>

Received on Friday, 9 January 2015 15:22:21 UTC