W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-dwbp-wg@w3.org > January 2015

RE: dwbp-ISSUE-96 (Share-PSI): Is the WG happy with the Share-PSI use case [Use Cases & Requirements Document]

From: Lee, Deirdre <Deirdre.Lee@deri.org>
Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2015 18:30:04 +0000
To: Phil Archer <phila@w3.org>, Data on the Web Best Practices Working Group <public-dwbp-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <DA0D3B2CE5F5614AA2307A974AFAC39B01552E6B00@UDSMBX02.uds.nuigalway.ie>
Hi Phil,



In terms of the suggested requirements from the Share-PSI use-case [file:///D:/Documents/GitHub/dwbp/usecasesv1.html#UC-SharePSI]:

·         R-Location – Included as R-GeographicalContext

·         R-AccessLevels - Included as R-AccessLevel



In termss of the new set of Reqs around policy issues:

·         R-Strategy

·         R-PolicySupport

Perhaps these would be best placed in the Share-PSI BPs as opposed to DWBP BPs? Happy to discuss for next version of BP Public Working Draft.



Cheers,

Deirdre



-----Original Message-----
From: Data on the Web Best Practices Working Group Issue Tracker [mailto:sysbot+tracker@w3.org]
Sent: 10 November 2014 20:44
To: public-dwbp-wg@w3.org
Subject: dwbp-ISSUE-96 (Share-PSI): Is the WG happy with the Share-PSI use case [Use Cases & Requirements Document]



dwbp-ISSUE-96 (Share-PSI): Is the WG happy with the Share-PSI use case [Use Cases & Requirements Document]



http://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/track/issues/96




Raised by: Steven Adler

On product: Use Cases & Requirements Document










Received on Sunday, 11 January 2015 18:30:37 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:39:31 UTC