Re: dwbp-ACTION-114: Complete use case and requirements for data enrichment. related to issue-72

Hi Deirdre,

thanks for your message, I think this is perfect the way you added to the
document.

The details of data enrichment will be available in a future version, it is
ok.

I think this issue (#72) is completed.

Regards,
Adriano.



Adriano C. Machado Pereira.

On Thu, Jan 22, 2015 at 9:12 AM, Lee, Deirdre <Deirdre.Lee@deri.org> wrote:

>  Hi Adriano,
>
> Thanks for info. I've added DataEnrichment as a challenge, I agree this
> makes sense and we can consider breaking this into more fine-grain
> requirements for future versions of UCR and BP. I've also added the
> description of DataEnrichment that you recommend.
> http://w3c.github.io/dwbp/usecasesv1.html#R-DataEnrichment
>
> Cheers,
> Deirdre
>
>    Deirdre Lee, Research Associate, eGovernment Group
>
> Insight Center for Data Analytics, NUI Galway, Ireland
>
> Twitter: @deirdrelee, Skype: deirdrelee
>
> Linkedin: ie.linkedin.com/in/leedeirdre/
>     ------------------------------
> *From:* adrianoc@gmail.com [adrianoc@gmail.com] on behalf of Adriano C.
> Machado Pereira [adrianoc@dcc.ufmg.br]
> *Sent:* 16 January 2015 15:26
> *To:* Lee, Deirdre
> *Cc:* public-dwbp-wg@w3.org; Bernadette Farias Lóscio
>
> *Subject:* Re: dwbp-ACTION-114: Complete use case and requirements for
> data enrichment. related to issue-72
>
>   Hi Deirdre,
>
>  thanks for your message and to share your ideas.
>
>  The idea for data enrichment is that it is composed by different data
> tasks. The data enrichment process consists of applying one or more tasks
> in an independent way, where the data D are transformed in data D´ as a
> result of one data enrichment task. This can be a cyclic process, providing
> more data structure as the tasks are performed.
>
>  About the table (3.2 Requirements by Challenge), do you think the
> challenge can be named "Data Enrichment"??? Or do you think we have to
> assign it to an existent challenge?
>
>  I imagine the following:
>
>  R-Data-Enrichment:
> It should be possible to perform some data enrichment tasks in order to
> aggregate value to data, therefore providing more value for user
> applications and services.
>
>  The idea is to later break it in small parts, according to the its tasks
> to apply in order to provide data enrichment. And I agree with you that it
> is better to add in a future version of the BP document.
>
>  What do you think about?
>
>  Thanks for your support!
> Regards,
> Adriano.
> --
>   Adriano C. Machado Pereira.
>
> On Sun, Jan 11, 2015 at 4:12 PM, Lee, Deirdre <Deirdre.Lee@deri.org>
> wrote:
>
>>  Hi Adriano,
>>
>>
>>
>> Thank you for your use-case Web Observatory [
>> http://w3c.github.io/dwbp/usecasesv1.html#UC-WebObservatory] and the
>> proposed new requirement(s) for Data Enrichment.
>>
>>
>>
>> I’m afraid I missed the discussion around this requirement. Could you add
>> a description for R-DataEnrichment and assign it to one of the Challenges
>> in the table
>> http://w3c.github.io/dwbp/usecasesv1.html#requirements-by-challenge?
>>
>>
>>
>> I know you also suggest breaking the requirement down further into
>> R-DataCharacterization; R-DataImputation; R-DataSegmentation;
>> R-DataDisambiguation; R-DataEntityRecognition; R-DataFusion.
>>
>> But perhaps this is something we could explore for the next Public
>> Working Draft of the BP Document?
>>
>>
>>
>> Cheers,
>>
>> Deirdre
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> *From:* adrianoc@gmail.com [mailto:adrianoc@gmail.com] *On Behalf Of *Adriano
>> C. Machado Pereira
>> *Sent:* 05 December 2014 14:50
>> *To:* public-dwbp-wg@w3.org; Bernadette Farias Lóscio
>> *Subject:* Re: dwbp-ACTION-114: Complete use case and requirements for
>> data enrichment. related to issue-72
>>
>>
>>
>> Hi all,
>>
>>
>>
>> thanks for your help!
>>
>>
>>
>> I have published the new use case for "Web Observatory", which demands
>> requirements for Data Enrichment.
>>
>>
>>
>> It is published in the Second Round Use Cases:
>>
>> http://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/wiki/Second-Round_Use_Cases
>>
>>
>>
>> Any comments or suggestions can be send to me.
>>
>>
>>
>> ACTION-114 can be closed now.
>>
>>
>>
>> Thanks! Regards,
>>
>> Adriano C. M Pereira.
>>
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Dec 5, 2014 at 12:01 PM, Adriano C. Machado Pereira <
>> adrianoc@dcc.ufmg.br> wrote:
>>
>> Thanks Bernadette and Yaso,
>>
>>
>>
>> I will publish there.
>>
>>
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Adriano.
>>
>> --
>>
>> Adriano C. Machado Pereira.
>>
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Dec 5, 2014 at 11:12 AM, Bernadette Farias Lóscio <
>> bfl@cin.ufpe.br> wrote:
>>
>> Great Adriano! Thanks!
>>
>> You can publish the new case in the following page:
>> http://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/wiki/Second-Round_Use_Cases
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Bernadette
>>
>>
>>
>> 2014-12-05 9:54 GMT-03:00 Yaso <yaso@nic.br>:
>>
>>
>>
>> On 12/5/14 9:53 AM, Adriano C. Machado Pereira wrote:
>> > Hi all!
>> >
>> > We have completed the new use case for "Web Observatory", which demands
>> > requirements for Data Enrichment.
>> >
>> \o/
>>
>> > I am sending attached to this message the UC description.
>> >
>> > Do I have to publish this new UC in the wiki DWBP?
>>
>> Do that, please, Adriano.
>>
>> >
>> > I would like to ask about this in order to complete this ACTION-114.
>> >
>> > Thanks! Regards,
>> > Adriano C. M Pereira.
>> >
>>
>> Thank you!
>> -yaso
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> > On Fri, Oct 31, 2014 at 4:16 PM, Data on the Web Best Practices Working
>> > Group Issue Tracker <sysbot+tracker@w3.org> wrote:
>> >
>> >> dwbp-ACTION-114: Complete use case and requirements for data
>> enrichment.
>> >> related to issue-72
>> >>
>> >> http://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/track/actions/114
>> >>
>> >> Assigned to: Adriano Pereira
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >
>>
>>   --
>> Brazilian Internet Steering Committee - CGI.br
>> W3C Brazil Office
>> @yaso
>>
>> 55 11 5509-3537 (4025)
>> skype: yasocordova
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>>
>> Bernadette Farias Lóscio
>> Centro de Informática
>> Universidade Federal de Pernambuco - UFPE, Brazil
>>
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>