W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-dwbp-wg@w3.org > January 2015

Re: [dwbp] Suggests additional content for BP1 implementation (#87)

From: Phil Archer <phila@w3.org>
Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2015 18:34:46 +0000
Message-ID: <54C142C6.9070002@w3.org>
To: Makx Dekkers <mail@makxdekkers.com>, 'Public DWBP WG' <public-dwbp-wg@w3.org>


On 22/01/2015 18:29, Makx Dekkers wrote:
>
> Not good that we have two issue trackers, especially as I don't know how to access the Github one.

Indeed. That's why I shut it down. Although I can't stop people 
commenting on individual pull requests. I'm not sure where e-mails go, 
it might just be to people who are contributors on Github. It's not the 
full WG and is not archived in our space so I'm anxious for it not to be 
used.

>
> What's that mention of DCAT-AP? I might think it is relevant, but for what and where?

You can see Carlos's suggestions  at

https://github.com/carlosiglesias/dwbp/commit/37ffee03a437a71f055735679a0ef48349e58ab8

and

https://github.com/carlosiglesias/dwbp/commit/31db9f89731419c9567bfd7a58e62acd478c6ed2

It's the latter than has the mention of DCAT-AP. I agree it probably 
needs citing somewhere, just not in *this* BP.

Phil.


>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Phil Archer [mailto:phila@w3.org]
>> Sent: Thursday, January 22, 2015 6:25 PM
>> To: Public DWBP WG
>> Subject: Re: [dwbp] Suggests additional content for BP1 implementation
>> (#87)
>>
>> Moving the conversation to the WG's mailing list (please don't use
>> GitHub's issue tracker - it just confuses things).
>>
>> -1 to this change.
>>
>> The original text talked about multilingualism as well as
>> specialisations of vocabularies (something that has been lost). The
>> list
>> of vocabs doesn't really tell people which one to use and when.
>> BP#ProvideMetadata already points to DCAT and VoID. And I think if
>> we're
>> going to cite schema.org - which I'm happy to do - then we should tell
>> people when to use that rather than DCAT (a question to which I'm
>> really
>> not sure of the answer).
>>
>> And so on.
>>
>> Overall, I think we should be more specific, giving the criteria ine
>> should use to make a selection and then point to a possible solution.
>> So, if you want DCAT but want to include versioning then use ADMS
>> (which
>> is a DCAT profile). If your aim is specifically to target your
>> metadata
>> at search engines then use schema.org and so on.
>>
>> I don't think the DCAT-AP is relevant here.
>>
>> Phil.
>>
>> On 22/01/2015 16:25, Carlos Laufer wrote:
>>> +1
>>>
>>> 2015-01-22 14:17 GMT-02:00 carlosiglesias <notifications@github.com>:
>>>
>>>> ------------------------------
>>>> You can view, comment on, or merge this pull request online at:
>>>>
>>>>     https://github.com/w3c/dwbp/pull/87
>>>> Commit Summary
>>>>
>>>>      - Suggests additional content for BP1 implementation
>>>>
>>>> File Changes
>>>>
>>>>      - *M* bp.html <https://github.com/w3c/dwbp/pull/87/files#diff-0>
>> (9)
>>>>
>>>> Patch Links:
>>>>
>>>>      - https://github.com/w3c/dwbp/pull/87.patch
>>>>      - https://github.com/w3c/dwbp/pull/87.diff
>>>>
>>>> —
>>>> Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
>>>> <https://github.com/w3c/dwbp/pull/87>.
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>> --
>>
>>
>> Phil Archer
>> W3C Data Activity Lead
>> http://www.w3.org/2013/data/
>>
>> http://philarcher.org
>> +44 (0)7887 767755
>> @philarcher1
>
>

-- 


Phil Archer
W3C Data Activity Lead
http://www.w3.org/2013/data/

http://philarcher.org
+44 (0)7887 767755
@philarcher1
Received on Thursday, 22 January 2015 18:34:52 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Thursday, 22 January 2015 18:34:53 UTC