- From: Laufer <laufer@globo.com>
- Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2015 12:27:41 -0200
- To: Bernadette Farias Lóscio <bfl@cin.ufpe.br>
- Cc: DWBP WG <public-dwbp-wg@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CA+pXJiic=XGPXvBiYA-KJCzXVy5r5+ACUGDJThTjFVdrM_UXtg@mail.gmail.com>
Hi, Bernadette, DBpedia documents a lot of things like applications, use cases, different ways of accessing data using sparql, credits, etc. But it is a documentation for humans. What I think is that a vocabulary as DCAT should be the responsible of pointing to these artifacts and the metadata related to them. So when in BP1 we say to use DCAT, I think we are saying: "document what metadata is being provided". If each of the artifacts has a vocabulary, so the vocabulary documentation is responsible for documenting the metadata. BP2 asserts to provide metadata for humans. I think that this includes the documentation for humans. What is to provide metadata for humans if you don't document it? For me, BP4 can be derived from BP1 + BP2 + BP3. Cheers, Laufer 2015-01-20 11:16 GMT-02:00 Bernadette Farias Lóscio <bfl@cin.ufpe.br>: > Hi Laufer, > > Thanks for your message! My comments are inline. > > > > The BP3 > > > > "Use standard terms to describe metadata - Metadata should be provided > using > > standard vocabularies for greater interoperability and discoverability." > > > > already suggest that a user should use vocabularies. > > yes! I agree! > > > > > BP1 (provide metadata) talks about the catalogs and I think that the > > documentation about what metadata is provided should be in these > catalogs. > > I think that the Provide Metadata BP is more general and later on it > will be specialized by other BP. > > > > > So, I think that BP1 and BP3 cover BP4. I do not know if the intention of > > BP4 was to call attention to code lists, but I think that if this would > be > > necessary, this info can be in section 7.4. > > The Document metadata BP should be rewritten to become more general, > i.e., not just vocabularies should be documented. In this case, what > else should be documented when talking about metadata? > > cheers, > Bernadette > > > > > Best, > > Laufer > > > > PS - again about sequential numbering as id - I do not like referring to > BPs > > in these way. If we suppress BP4, this won't be true because we will have > > another BP4. > > > > > > > > -- > > . . . .. . . > > . . . .. > > . .. . > > > > -- > Bernadette Farias Lóscio > Centro de Informática > Universidade Federal de Pernambuco - UFPE, Brazil > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- > -- . . . .. . . . . . .. . .. .
Received on Tuesday, 20 January 2015 14:28:10 UTC